Donald Trump for President of the USA

Bread2.0 wrote:1...2.....

Nat's only fooling. It's a plot to get rid of us.

You staying up for the rebuttal lecture later?

I think I'll save it for the morning.

Me too. I don't take the internet that seriously,although I'm sure some people do.

I've got a hair shirt going cheap if anyone's interested. Bargain.

I'll probably log on while I'm eating my breakfast in the morning.

In my nice new kitchen.

Good man. Always pays to start the day with a smile.

Shame about bwfc74, hopefully he'll reconsider.

Just watched the footage of Trump with Obama and Paul Ryan. Rabbit caught in a set of headlights springs to mind. It looks like it's slowly dawning on him the sheer magnitude of the situation he's found himself in.

Check his body language out, sheepish, vacant and unenthusiastic. A total contrast from the super macho bulldozer who was going to level everything.

He looks like he's got no grasp of the job in hand.

This could be a very short presidency judging by these performances, and he's still not got the job yet.

Out of his depth.

Lets hope he doesn't overdo it, in order to show that he's 'got what it takes'

King Bill wrote:Shame about bwfc74, hopefully he'll reconsider.

I hope so too.

I've no axe to grind with him and I've always considered him to be a good poster.

I've even offered him a mod role for part of the forum, so it is nothing personal from me (despite Bread trying to stir the shit again as per his post above on the matter).

I've no idea why he deleted his account, I doubt he sets much store by my opinions anyway, and he posted again some 8 or 9 hours after our exchange of words, so I can't see that being the cause of his exit from here.

He's certainly welcome back on Nuts anytime he choses.

boltonbonce wrote:Out of his depth.

I think your right BB. Its slowly dawning in him that he's put himself in the position of proving to be a catastrophic failure and a public one at that. I bet he's bricking it!
I don't think he'll last 4 years

Sluffy wrote:



I've no idea why he deleted his account

And therein lies the problem.......truly folks, it really does. Bigly.

rammywhite wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Out of his depth.

I think your right BB. Its slowly dawning in him that he's put himself in the position of proving to be a catastrophic failure and a public one at that. I bet he's bricking it!
I don't think he'll last 4 years

Have to agree, he did look lost.
There have been inept presidents in the past, (apparently), and they are shored up by their administration, and wives in some cases. (can't remember which one in particular I read about).
The problem with this 'support' is that non-elected people start making decisions for the country, with knock-on effects for the rest of us.

gloswhite wrote:
There have been inept presidents in the past, (apparently), and they are shored up by their administration, and wives in some cases. (can't remember which one in particular I read about).
The problem with this 'support' is that non-elected people start making decisions for the country, with knock-on effects for the rest of us.

Like Theresa May for example.

Nothing like Theresa May. She was elected by her government, which was elected by the country.

gloswhite wrote:

rammywhite wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Out of his depth.

I think your right BB. Its slowly dawning in him that he's put himself in the position of proving to be a catastrophic failure and a public one at that. I bet he's bricking it!
I don't think he'll last 4 years

Have to agree, he did look lost.
There have been inept presidents in the past, (apparently), and they are shored up by their administration, and wives in some cases. (can't remember which one in particular I read about).
The problem with this 'support' is that non-elected people start making decisions for the country, with knock-on effects for the rest of us.

I think in most administrations many of the key decisions are taken if not by unelected bodies certainly with significant input from them.
Nobody will ever convince me that George Bush Jnr made all major policy decisions because he could barely string a sentence together to a large degree the President is a figurehead and many decisions come from people who make a huge effort to remain out of the public eye and therefore avoid the flack when decisions go tits up.

Regarding 74 my experience of him is similar to Glos's in that every point you make is met by demands to provide evidence in triplicate signed by your headmaster on anything to do with politics and I found him a bit of an over opinionated bleeding heart.
However I enjoyed interacting with him on non political matters and on football stuff, I just think he takes politics to seriously and isn't adept at accepting other people can have a point of view different to theirs without pushing them to back it up to the n'th degree.

I find sluffy to be fair and even with posters generally and haven't had any problems with him, despite his protestations to the contrary I do believe he is at least a little obsessed with the ST although many of the things he points out about them I agree with. Any obsession with the ST sluffy has is at least matched by breads obsession with sluffy, every time he posts on anything bread is in with digs and was responsible for the biggest agenda driven campaign on here when trying to get Scott and Boggers banned.

The Trump cabinet doesn't impress me at all.

gloswhite wrote:Nothing like Theresa May. She was elected by her government, which was elected by the country.

Well 36.9% of those who bothered to vote anyway. Although they actually voted for a Tory party led by Cameron and presumably endorsing his policies not May's current policies.

They were all over Gordon Brown. Set a date Theresa.

I agree May should go to the country and call off the appeal over Article 50.

i thought that also. However, to get A50 registered, it would be easier to go to Parliament, assuming labour will honour Corbyns pledge not to oppose it.