Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Should boggers be re-instated

+10
DEANO82
Boggersbelief
whatsgoingon
Natasha Whittam
Bollotom2014
Bread2.0
xmiles
boltonbonce
Norpig
karlypants
14 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Should boggers be re-instated

Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_lcap21%Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_rcap 21% [ 5 ]
Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_lcap46%Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_rcap 46% [ 11 ]
Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_lcap4%Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_rcap 4% [ 1 ]
Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_lcap17%Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_rcap 17% [ 4 ]
Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_lcap12%Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Vote_rcap 12% [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 24


Go down  Message [Page 2 of 4]

21Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:21

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs, piss about a bit or sometimes react to things. I don't have any agenda on here I just go with the flow.

22Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:33

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs

88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.

I have feelings you know.

23Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:42

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs

88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.

I have feelings you know.
bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.
because you are "special"

24Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:55

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs

88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.

I have feelings you know.
bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.
because you are "special"
What happened to the other 10%?

25Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:59

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

karlypants wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs

88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.

I have feelings you know.
bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.
because you are "special"
What happened to the other 10%?
thats held in reserve for your bum chummery behind bb

26Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:01

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Very Happy

27Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:07

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%

:facepalm:

It's posts like that which show why you spend your afternoons posting on a football forum and not running a major international PLC.

28Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:08

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%

:facepalm:

It's posts like that which show why you spend your afternoons posting on a football forum and not running a major international PLC.
keep up we've covered that,

29Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:11

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:
keep up we've covered that,

Yes, but abusing you never gets old.

30Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:12

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
keep up we've covered that,

Yes, but abusing you never gets old.
Unlike you, that's bullery I've got feelings you know,

31Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:29

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

so where is Boggers ? Is he keeping us waiting for his big return? I can hardly contain my excitement here

32Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:43

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Norpig wrote:so where is Boggers ? Is he keeping us waiting for his big return? I can hardly contain my excitement here
He's back girder your loins

33Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:01

xmiles

xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Jay Jay Okocha

Well they haven't insulted anyone yet but they seem to think quantity rather than quality is all that matters. Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.

34Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:05

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

xmiles wrote:Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.

How ironic.

35Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:08

Guest


Guest

Boggersbelief wrote:
xmiles wrote:Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.

How ironic.

Do you understand what ironic means Boggers?

36Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:09

DEANO82

DEANO82
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

Alanis Morissette didn't and she wrote a song about it.

37Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:11

Guest


Guest

Are you suggesting Boggers could be Alanis Morissette? What would that make Scott?

38Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:12

DEANO82

DEANO82
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

No , just saying not everyone understands what irony is, which isn't ironic.

39Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:18

Guest


Guest

Very true, but the question was whether or not Boggers does?

40Boggers - Should boggers be re-instated - Page 2 Empty Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:25

Bread2.0

Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Andy Walker

Are the results of this poll going to be legally binding?

You know.....like in the Brexit Referendum?

The people of Nuts have spoken and I would hate to think that the powers behind the forum would stoop so low as to ignore the result (and the will of their stakeholders) just to serve their own ends.

That'd be a shit trick - ignoring a popular mandate simply because you think the people who've voted are all weak-minded or summat.

You would expect that from Mike Smith and those dicks in the ST, not Nuts.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 4]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum