Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Trump v May

+14
gloswhite
Norpig
terenceanne
Bollotom2014
boltonbonce
Sluffy
Natasha Whittam
wessy
Bread2.0
rammywhite
Soul Kitchen
wanderlust
Lard Lad
xmiles
18 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Go down  Message [Page 8 of 9]

151Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Thu Jun 08 2017, 20:47

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Looks like he's been told to keep the really juicy stuff out of the public gaze "in the national interest" so presumably trump will get away with it. 

How he can say that he can't tell the enquiry is beyond me.

152Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Sat Jun 10 2017, 16:32

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

Because, at this level, there really are things that shouldn't be in the public domain. 
Unfortunately, Trump seems to think his role as POTUS puts him above not only the law, but common sense, and acceptable behavior. It won't be too long before he's impeached, unless he starts to behave like a politician, and not an untouchable company director.

153Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Sat Jun 10 2017, 16:36

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I'd settle for him behaving like he's,at the very least,on nodding terms with sanity.

Someone on US TV described him as 'a horse loose in a hospital',which is pretty fair comment. Very Happy

154Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Sat Jun 10 2017, 18:16

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

gloswhite wrote:Because, at this level, there really are things that shouldn't be in the public domain. 
Unfortunately, Trump seems to think his role as POTUS puts him above not only the law, but common sense, and acceptable behavior. It won't be too long before he's impeached, unless he starts to behave like a politician, and not an untouchable company director.
I agree that national security is a primary concern but if it turns out that the election was rigged by the Russians or that classified info was leaked to them then trump shouldn't be Potus anyway and the American people have the right to know.

Corruption at the highest level "trumps" national security imo.

155Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Tue Jun 13 2017, 21:17

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Have to say that the attorney general  recusing himself without any legal basis re the comey sacking is phenomenal tv.

156Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Wed Jun 14 2017, 09:58

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

It'll be interesting to see if another key witness, (bugger, forgotten his name), will be sacked by Trump. 
Its all becoming farcical, and sooner or later, he will fall flat on his face, and deservedly so.

157Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Fri Jun 16 2017, 13:10

okocha

okocha
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Both Trump and May have vital, big chunks missing from their hearts. Corbyn and the Queen giving May a lesson in humanity.

158Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 16:06

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

May has had to cough up £1 BILLION extra funding for Northern Ireland to buy the DUP vote.

Simultaneously the Supreme Court has partially lifted the injunction against Donald Trump re the travel ban so it looks like some of his proposal to stop people arriving from 6 countries - if they don't have a bona fide relationship with an American - will go into effect.

159Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 16:08

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

wanderlust wrote:May has had to cough up £1 BILLION extra funding for Northern Ireland to buy the DUP vote.

In other words,it's a bung.

160Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 16:09

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

So there is a magic money tree after all? Mrs May was telling fibs then.

161Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 17:09

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I want to punch her in the face.

162Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 17:10

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Ha ha, because Labour or any other party wouldn't have done the same would they?

163Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Mon Jun 26 2017, 23:42

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Trump is allegedly making the wall between the USA and Mexico out of solar panels so that the heat generated will benefit Mexico's economy.  :facepalm:

164Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Wed Jun 28 2017, 12:39

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

boltonbonce wrote:
wanderlust wrote:May has had to cough up £1 BILLION extra funding for Northern Ireland to buy the DUP vote.

In other words,it's a bung.
No other words required mate.

That's a school per vote.

165Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Wed Jun 28 2017, 14:14

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

Lets hope they aren't as generous with the EU

166Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Wed Jun 28 2017, 15:44

xmiles

xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Jay Jay Okocha

gloswhite wrote:Lets hope they aren't as generous with the EU

So how many billions do you think they will agree to pay the EU?

167Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Thu Jun 29 2017, 10:52

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

xmiles wrote:
gloswhite wrote:Lets hope they aren't as generous with the EU

So how many billions do you think they will agree to pay the EU?
£350 million per week?

168Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Fri Jun 30 2017, 17:47

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

169Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Fri Jun 30 2017, 23:17

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

170Trump v May - Page 9 Empty Re: Trump v May Sat Jul 01 2017, 13:18

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Yesterday, the French press were revelling in Britain's demise as they anticipate further weakening the British economy as they did in the last main EU negotiations when they handed Thatcher her ass. Publicly of course their Government is talking a fair fight, but we all know that we are in big, big trouble especially as the French economy has overtaken the British economy since the Tories took power. Add to that this week's figures which showed Britain has by far the lowest growth of all G7 nations as the Government continue to drag us back.

Predictably, the U-turns continue with David Davies expressing his concern over May's inflexibility tying his hands in what he can negotiate with and what concessions he can make. 

Question is why is the key British negotiator, who has been told exactly what we want and exactly what (the Tories say) is on the table is seeking to broaden the scope of the negotiations?

Answer: It's bleedin' obvious.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 8 of 9]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum