Boris Johnson to be our next Prime Minister?

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:He'll send for John Rambo.

Well you either threaten them or offer them money and weapons. That's all these third world losers are interested in.

Instead of blaming Boris why don't Emily thornberry and the other numb skulls come up with a solution? This is their ally after all.

Funny how you still can't explain how you are going to "fucking come and get her out".

Do you really think making pathetically undeliverable threats will have any effect except to make us look stupid?

So what is your solution?

Didn't people say trumps rhetoric would have no effect on North Korea.

T.R.O.Y wrote:The solution Thornberry has been pushing is the same as that the Tories are - diplomatic pressure and longer term a resurrection of the Iran nuclear deal. 

There's little choice outside of the Rambo fantasy land you and the Trump fanatics seem to live in.

I'm not a Trump "fanatic" what on earth are you talking about.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Didn't people say trumps rhetoric would have no effect on North Korea.

They're playing Trump like a violin. When they sent back Otto Warmbier in a vegetative state, he had the chance to show his mettle. Despite the rhetoric, he's a pussy, and not the kind he likes to grab.
He's a weak, lying, sexually deviant narcissist, who, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, would make a drum out of the skin of his own mother in order to sound his own praises.
I'm not a fan.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:The solution Thornberry has been pushing is the same as that the Tories are - diplomatic pressure and longer term a resurrection of the Iran nuclear deal. 

There's little choice outside of the Rambo fantasy land you and the Trump fanatics seem to live in.

I'm not a Trump "fanatic" what on earth are you talking about.

I was careful to say you and the Trump fanatics - so as not to lump you in with them. On this particular topic you share the same views though.

No, I just don't think what we're doing (nothing) is working.

boltonbonce wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Didn't people say trumps rhetoric would have no effect on North Korea.

They're playing Trump like a violin. When they sent back Otto Warmbier in a vegetative state, he had the chance to show his mettle. Despite the rhetoric, he's a pussy, and not the kind he likes to grab.
He's a weak, lying, sexually deviant narcissist, who, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, would make a drum out of the skin of his own mother in order to sound his own praises.
I'm not a fan.

Well they were throwing bombs over Japan and testing high power nukes every other month.

They're not at the moment. This because trump threatened them.

Long term it might not work but short term it has.

He's also got them to the table for the first time ever.

xmiles wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:He'll send for John Rambo.

Well you either threaten them or offer them money and weapons. That's all these third world losers are interested in.

Instead of blaming Boris why don't Emily thornberry and the other numb skulls come up with a solution? This is their ally after all.

Funny how you still can't explain how you are going to "fucking come and get her out".

Do you really think making pathetically undeliverable threats will have any effect except to make us look stupid?

So what is your solution?

I assume your inability to reply is a tacit admission you were just talking bollocks and not for the first time either.

xmiles wrote:

xmiles wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:He'll send for John Rambo.

Well you either threaten them or offer them money and weapons. That's all these third world losers are interested in.

Instead of blaming Boris why don't Emily thornberry and the other numb skulls come up with a solution? This is their ally after all.

Funny how you still can't explain how you are going to "fucking come and get her out".

Do you really think making pathetically undeliverable threats will have any effect except to make us look stupid?

So what is your solution?

I assume your inability to reply is a tacit admission you were just talking bollocks and not for the first time either.

Rich coming from you. 

I would suggest it would be a similar excerise to other special operations to remove people from captivity. 

Not being a military expert though I'm not sure but there are people paid to devise strategies such as this.

I really do not believe there is a credible military strategy using the SAS or similar to extract her from an Iranian prison just north of Tehran. Threatening to do so just makes us look ridiculous.

boltonbonce wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Didn't people say trumps rhetoric would have no effect on North Korea.

They're playing Trump like a violin. When they sent back Otto Warmbier in a vegetative state, he had the chance to show his mettle. Despite the rhetoric, he's a pussy, and not the kind he likes to grab.
He's a weak, lying, sexually deviant narcissist, who, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, would make a drum out of the skin of his own mother in order to sound his own praises.
I'm not a fan.

Don't hold back bonce

Now we've got Boris. The mind boggles.

God help us all with this fuckwit in charge!

Better than Corbyn though.

Cajunboy wrote:Better than Corbyn though.

is it bollocks

Norpig wrote:

Cajunboy wrote:Better than Corbyn though.

is it bollocks

In fact it gives Corbyn a great opportunity. Boris will call a snap election.

Norpig wrote:

Cajunboy wrote:Better than Corbyn though.

is it bollocks

It’s true and better than Jeremy I fixed the NHS Cunt.

Boris the Great, he will do a good job and fix those euro twats.

Angry Dad wrote:Boris the Great, he will do a good job and fix those euro twats.

And if he doesn’t we have Mr. Farage to rely on AD!