Sluffy, sorry mate but no need to be so nasty in your reply to Lusty. You’re right in what you say but come on, let’s not start the arguments again. I am of course perfect and so don’t expect everyone else to have my expertise but I’m always polite when I point out their lack of knowledge compared to mine.
Where have I been nasty?
Look at things through my eyes, I clearly knew what he claimed was wrong - I'm sure you and most others would know that too if you had thought about it just for a second. The thing is though that must people don't seem to think and just carry on the 'myth' based on what was said.
I wasn't nasty, rude, obnoxious or any other word you would like to choose in my replies - I simply stated what he said was untrue and gave the facts - and a link to them.
As always Wanderlust can never admit to being wrong and replied in the way he did.
OK, not a problem, particularly because what he added in his post did nothing to change his overall point he was making was still wrong - as I explained in my reply.
What exactly do you view that I'd done wrong at all?
I can't see anything?
He then decided to bring in others to escalate the matter and make out that I was being some sort of a prick or something - I wasn't being one though?
I went to the trouble of explaining how I knew right from the very start he was factually incorrect and I believed I've been anything but 'nasty' to him.
He DOES post stuff often that is incorrect and he DOESN'T ever accept he's wrong about anything.
That's not me being nasty, that's me stating a fact.
I suspect very much though that it is just him trying to stir the site up again because I'd called him out earlier that day for posting a borderline racist remark - which unsurprisingly he's kept quiet about ever since![You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]