Hypnotist Paul McKenna thinks the very importance we as a society attach to having a balanced diet is the biggest reason the majority of us don't have one.
In his book he writes about a fascinating 1930's experiment, where "scientists gave a group of toddlers unlimited twenty-four/seven access to a vast range of foods from ice cream to spinach, essentially allowing them to create their own diet over a period of thirty days based on their own sense of what they wanted to eat and when. The result? While they each chose different foods at different times, every single child in the study wound up eating what was considered to be a balanced diet over the course of the month."
So if we weren't from a young age heavily influenced by other people (parents, experts in the media) telling us what we should and shouldn't eat, would we end up with a reasonably balanced diet because we possess a naturally developed sense of what we want to eat based on what our bodies need to survive?
In his book he writes about a fascinating 1930's experiment, where "scientists gave a group of toddlers unlimited twenty-four/seven access to a vast range of foods from ice cream to spinach, essentially allowing them to create their own diet over a period of thirty days based on their own sense of what they wanted to eat and when. The result? While they each chose different foods at different times, every single child in the study wound up eating what was considered to be a balanced diet over the course of the month."
So if we weren't from a young age heavily influenced by other people (parents, experts in the media) telling us what we should and shouldn't eat, would we end up with a reasonably balanced diet because we possess a naturally developed sense of what we want to eat based on what our bodies need to survive?