Does Anyone Really Need More Than One Kid?

Two twats have today been sentenced to two years in prison for child neglect.

Their nine children were found covered in piss and poo, mould and ivy growing in their bedrooms, and all were found to be considerably lower in intelligence than they should be.

The twatish parents were rightly sent to prison but the father tried to blame Social Services for not supporting his massive family enough. And here lies the problem, people think they can have as many kids as they want and the state should pitch in and help - in both money and care.

Isn't it about time a limit was put on couples having more than one kid? Who needs more than one kid anyway - you've seen one child you've seen them all. And let's face it, 99.9% turn out to be massive failures who are a burden on either their parents or the state. Can someone please explain the point of having more than one child anyway?

Would you support a licence scheme where only those people who could afford a child could conceive, and only once?

This is a win-win situation, there is no loser.

What about disabled people?

Any ideas about how we solve that "problem".....?

Breadman wrote:What about disabled people?

Any ideas about how we solve that "problem".....?

What has that got to do with having too many children?

You said:


"And here lies the problem, people think they can have as many kids as they want and the state should pitch in and help - in both money and care."


Thus implying that they are a financial burden on the state.


Therefore, disabled people who claim Disability Living Allowance, are presumably a similar burden.


Keep up, love......

Breadman wrote:You said:


"And here lies the problem, people think they can have as many kids as they want and the state should pitch in and help - in both money and care."


Thus implying that they are a financial burden on the state.


Therefore, disabled people who claim Disability Living Allowance, are presumably a similar burden.


Keep up, love......

It's a completely different argument.

I am saying we should restrict the number of kids people are allowed to have, it doesn't matter whether they are able-bodied or disabled.

What possible downside is there to stopping people having loads of kids?

Why are you so bothered Nat?

scottjames30 wrote:Why are you so bothered Nat?

Mainly because the more kids people have the more the drain on the Earth's resources. It's suicide.

People are selfish. And stupid.

That's not a very Christian attitude, is it?

What happened to "live and let live"...?

Breadman wrote:That's not a very Christian attitude, is it?

What happened to "live and let live"...?

When the lights go out and you're fighting in the street for the last cola bottle, remember my warning.

Does anyone need anything? No not really. 

If we're being fatalistic.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Why are you so bothered Nat?

Mainly because the more kids people have the more the drain on the Earth's resources. It's suicide.

People are selfish. And stupid.

Nat, folk have been having loads of kids since Adam and Eve, or in your case Adam and Steve   .

Don't worry about it, we'll all be long gone before all the water and the sun run out.

I bet cavemen used to have loads of kids in their cave, throwing rocks at dinosaurs and pissing on each other.

scottjames30 wrote:

Nat, folk have been having loads of kids since Adam and Eve, or in your case Adam and Steve   .

Don't worry about it, we'll all be long gone before all the water and the sun run out.

We won't be long gone, there's a real chance some energy sources will run out in the next two or three decades.

And anyway, we have a responsibility to future generations to safeguard their future.

In a 100 years people will look back at this generation and laugh at how stupid and selfish we were.

I'm with you Nat,if you can support 9 kids without state help bang away.But Earths resources are running out,we are in the worst period of Austerity all over Europe.The USA has tent cities in many states since the wankers erm bankers caused the current recession.In China they made it law you could have one child and get whatever child benefits you get in China for one child but have 2 your on your own.

The Chinese intimidated and punished families wth more than 1 child and forced women that were pregnant with a second child to terrminate the pregnancy. Lovely regime.

NickFazer wrote:The Chinese intimidated and punished families wth more than 1 child and forced women that were pregnant with a second child to terrminate the pregnancy. Lovely regime.

The initial idea was right though. Surely you accept if we keep breeding like rabbits the world is finished?

Now the country with the biggest GDP in the world.Sometimes hard decisions have to be made for the greater good.

Nat we are singing from the same Hymn sheet.Look at the mess going on in Iraq caused by us the USA and a few others.The blood shed deaths,outweighs anything the 1 child policy introduced by the Chinese.So what does that make us.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

NickFazer wrote:The Chinese intimidated and punished families wth more than 1 child and forced women that were pregnant with a second child to terrminate the pregnancy. Lovely regime.

The initial idea was right though. Surely you accept if we keep breeding like rabbits the world is finished?

We keep breeding? What's your contribution ffs?
To keep a man happy you keep his belly full and his bollox empty, how do you rate?!

Nats blow jobs are toe curlers( so I've heard) and her Sunday Roast is the BOLLOX ( so I've heard) !  

Soul Kitchen wrote:
We keep breeding? What's your contribution ffs?
To keep a man happy you keep his belly full and his bollox empty, how do you rate?!

My contribution is to not get pregnant for the sake of it.

Amazing that no one can see that over-population is eventually going to do for mankind.