Gartside mentioned how Dougie had been "working tirelessly on the club's infrastructure (but that work wasn't reflected in the performances)" so i was thinking that what is left behind may play an important part in writing the spec for the next manager.
The club can't afford to go in a completely different direction so presumably the incoming person should be qualified to make the most of the type of players Dougie has brought in shouldn't (s)he?
Dougie had planned a few "for the future" and I'd imagine the Board are going to stick with going down the path of youth development. Clayton, Hall, Threlkeld, Kellett, Vela, Lester, Odelusi, Iliev, Youngs, Clough and the other kids are potentially a source of talent and profit and I reckon they'll look for someone who could bring the best out of them as well as deal with our obvious immediate first team issues.
I'd love it if one or more of these kids came good, so I hope they're given a proper chance. Are the Board likely to bear this in mind when appointing the next manager?
The club can't afford to go in a completely different direction so presumably the incoming person should be qualified to make the most of the type of players Dougie has brought in shouldn't (s)he?
Dougie had planned a few "for the future" and I'd imagine the Board are going to stick with going down the path of youth development. Clayton, Hall, Threlkeld, Kellett, Vela, Lester, Odelusi, Iliev, Youngs, Clough and the other kids are potentially a source of talent and profit and I reckon they'll look for someone who could bring the best out of them as well as deal with our obvious immediate first team issues.
I'd love it if one or more of these kids came good, so I hope they're given a proper chance. Are the Board likely to bear this in mind when appointing the next manager?