Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
Zat Shite
+20
Natasha Whittam
Hipster_Nebula
SKDArmy
Triumph
Culcheth_White
Whitesince63
CAMPO
BoltonTillIDie
doffcocker
Reebok Trotter
wessy
scottjames30
aaron_bwfc
Bolton Nuts
karlypants
rammywhite
Boggersbelief
White84
wanderlust
bryan458
24 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
32 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 10:01
rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Triumph wrote:Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
You're correct Triumph - the way the fans can help us get out of the mess we're in is to boo our own players. Really builds confidence Even the title of this thread is a disgrace. Zat Shite!!
33 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 10:39
SKDArmy
Nicky Hunt
Triumph wrote:Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
Sadly you're very wrong. Seeing as a good half of the crowd booed him I'm pretty sure we do need them as without them our financial state would be far worse
34 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 10:48
Triumph
Tony Kelly
So Booing us into division one will help our finances?SKDArmy wrote:Triumph wrote:Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
Sadly you're very wrong. Seeing as a good half of the crowd booed him I'm pretty sure we do need them as without them our financial state would be far worse
36 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 11:33
Bolton Nuts
Admin
I didn't boo Zat, I clapped him to try to be encouraging. However, I can't be certain that the booing was not helpful. For all I know the boo's made him buck up his ideas. Who knows?
37 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 11:52
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Biggie wrote:I didn't boo Zat, I clapped him to try to be encouraging.
Ha ha ha , lets clap the team when they're playing shite.
38 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 12:02
bryan458
Tony Kelly
Yea, it should have been "TWAT SHITE"rammywhite wrote:Triumph wrote:Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
You're correct Triumph - the way the fans can help us get out of the mess we're in is to boo our own players. Really builds confidence Even the title of this thread is a disgrace. Zat Shite!!
39 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 12:04
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
I think the accounts clearly showed what a relatively insignificant contribution to overall income is made by the fans so don't get too carried away with the financial clout bit.
40 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 12:12
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
I won't comment on his overall performance but when you make game altering mistakes on a regular basis there really can't be a place for you in the team, no matter how well you play either side of them.
Knight has error prone for much of his career.
Knight has error prone for much of his career.
41 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 13:13
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
scottjames30 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
This made me laugh though.
He needs a new sport to play, Rugby perhaps?
42 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 14:02
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
I didn't boo him, mainly because I had a very tasty prawn sandwich in my mouth at the time.
However, this myth that booing someone makes them play worse is utter bollocks. If someone says you're shite at something it's human nature to try harder and prove them wrong - which is exactly what happened.
I honestly think the team would perform better if we booed them as soon as they came out of the tunnel. We've tried supporting them, where the fuck has that got us?
However, this myth that booing someone makes them play worse is utter bollocks. If someone says you're shite at something it's human nature to try harder and prove them wrong - which is exactly what happened.
I honestly think the team would perform better if we booed them as soon as they came out of the tunnel. We've tried supporting them, where the fuck has that got us?
43 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 14:19
bryan458
Tony Kelly
Triumph wrote:Shame on the tossers that boooed Zat Knight, how childish fecking grow up or go to Old Trafford because we dont need/want you at the Reebok!!! DISGUSTED!!!!!
I respect everyone's opinion, even the boo_ers, these people probably pay thousands of pounds every season and are perfectly entitled to express their displeasure, but I don't think you should be telling supporters to fuck off to Old Trafford, or calling them Tossers just because you don't approve!!!!!!!
44 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 14:26
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
karlypants wrote:scottjames30 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
This made me laugh though.
He needs a new sport to play, Rugby perhaps?
At least he cleared the first defender which is something Eagles fails to do at free kicks and corners.
46 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 16:06
Guest
Guest
To be fair to Knight, Lonergan was at fault for the second goal.
He came charging out despite Knight pointing for him to stay back ready to receive the back-pass.
He came charging out despite Knight pointing for him to stay back ready to receive the back-pass.
47 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 16:57
doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Natasha Whittam wrote:I didn't boo him, mainly because I had a very tasty prawn sandwich in my mouth at the time.
However, this myth that booing someone makes them play worse is utter bollocks. If someone says you're shite at something it's human nature to try harder and prove them wrong - which is exactly what happened.
I honestly think the team would perform better if we booed them as soon as they came out of the tunnel. We've tried supporting them, where the fuck has that got us?
Natasha this is you at your best.
I don't agree wholeheartedly. I want the fans to be fair at all times. Sometimes that means supporting a player that's cocked up but is giving 100%. Sometimes it means giving stick to players that simply wouldn't otherwise give a shit.
You can't always rely on a manager to give players the kick up the arse they need. This idea that it's wrong for fans to put players under any pressure whatsoever is nonsense.
48 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 17:51
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
doffcocker wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:I didn't boo him, mainly because I had a very tasty prawn sandwich in my mouth at the time.
However, this myth that booing someone makes them play worse is utter bollocks. If someone says you're shite at something it's human nature to try harder and prove them wrong - which is exactly what happened.
I honestly think the team would perform better if we booed them as soon as they came out of the tunnel. We've tried supporting them, where the fuck has that got us?
Natasha this is you at your best.
I don't agree wholeheartedly. I want the fans to be fair at all times. Sometimes that means supporting a player that's cocked up but is giving 100%. Sometimes it means giving stick to players that simply wouldn't otherwise give a shit.
You can't always rely on a manager to give players the kick up the arse they need. This idea that it's wrong for fans to put players under any pressure whatsoever is nonsense.
I think the "fairness" bit is right - as opposed to just giving them stick from the off as Natasha is proposing. Fans know this instinctively which is why Knight got applauded when he finally got his game together.
Natasha is right in saying that Knight's game improved after he was booed, but where's the evidence to say that his improvement was a result of the booing? Well perhaps there is some...
If (as I recall) Knight was booed after the first goal it tends to support the idea that booing doesn't work - as he did it again. If on the other hand he was only booed after the second, it would tend to support the booing theory.
Not a very empirical test, as I'm pretty sure our Zat was well aware of his errors, but it's a straw to clutch at.
49 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 17:53
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Zat Shite?
I thought he was called, Zat Knightmere?
I thought he was called, Zat Knightmere?
50 Re: Zat Shite Thu Jan 02 2014, 18:28
doffcocker
Ivan Campo
wanderlust wrote:
If (as I recall) Knight was booed after the first goal it tends to support the idea that booing doesn't work - as he did it again. If on the other hand he was only booed after the second, it would tend to support the booing theory.
It was after the second.
Going off on a tangent, I hate it when something like this happens and everybody goes "our fans are a disgrace, gotta be the worst out there."
Do people seriously think this kinda thing doesn't happen at Blackburn, Boro, West Brom, Wolves, Liverpool, Chelsea, Bury, you name it...?
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum