Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

What are the chances of Bolton Wanderers signing Lukas Jutkiewicz from Middlesbrough?

+6
Natasha Whittam
Reebok_Rebel
JohannesburgWanderer
Triumph
Reebok Trotter
karlypants
10 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Wanderers  re-started a Juke, which started the whole club singing – but would it be a tragedy if the striker did not remain at the Reebok?

Like Jay Spearing before him, loan star Lukas Jutkiewicz has proved to be the right man, in the right place, at the right time – helping the Whites stay alive in a difficult Championship campaign.

Whether he stays for good depends entirely on whether the Middlesbrough striker is available at the right price, with Dougie Freedman likely to be counting every penny beyond the first of May.

Plucked from the Boro bench in January, the 24-year-old has been a surprise success at Bolton, scoring his sixth goal in 12 starts in Saturday’s derby draw with Wigan Athletic.

That achievement has quite literally come at a cost for Freedman, though, with his chances of signing Jutkiewicz on a permanent basis hanging on his ability to haggle a fair price for his services this summer.

With 12 months remaining on his contract on Teesside, there are many Boro fans who would welcome the former Everton man back for another spell.

Aitor Karanka, his manager at the Riverside, seems slightly less sure, with the Spaniard keen to hold off any decision on selling him until the summer.

“I don't know what will happen with him - it is something for the future rather than now,” he said in a recent interview.

Word in the North East is that the Spaniard will look to remodel his strikeforce in the summer after loanee Danny Graham – also a target for Wanderers at one point - has failed to make much of an impact.

But Boro are under no pressure to sell, despite Jutkiewicz indicating that he sees his future lying elsewhere.

Wanderers have grown to rely rather heavily on his presence up front, an influence that has even extended to goalkeeper Adam Bogdan.

When asked about how he had changed his own game since returning from injury, the Hungarian revealed that the striker’s presence had been a major influence.

“It’s so important having him up there,” he said. “You know you have a target to aim at and that he is more often that not going to keep hold of the ball and it won’t be coming straight back at you.”

Spearing had a similarly profound influence in his first season at the Reebok, spent on loan from Liverpool.

After scooping the player-of-the-year award, the midfielder returned to Anfield to face an uncertain future with his boyhood club under Brendan Rogers.

It took a sizeable offer, thought to be worth £1.5million plus add ons, to convince the Reds to part with their man. A similar fee may well be necessary this summer when looking to secure Jutkiewicz.

Such investments, argues Freedman, are key to reviving Wanderers as a “trading club”.

And though most of his business last summer was done on the cheap – with Bosman frees such as Alex Baptiste and Marc Tierney – that well can clearly only be returned to a certain number of times.

Finances are tight and getting tighter. Wanderers will see their parachute payment reduced by half to £8million for the next two seasons, so must continue to reduce their wage bill and costs from the Premier League days.

Additionally, the spectre of Financial Fair Play looms large. Despite legal challenges in the offing to the controversial regulations it seems likely that Wanderers and several other dissenting Football League clubs will have to continue jumping through hoops whilst fighting the rule-makers.

All of which means a deal for Jutkiewicz, whilst longed for by fans and the man himself, is by no means a sure thing.

Freedman has already missed out on targets such as Kevin McNaughton, Craig Dawson and Liam Feeney because of their success on loan – he will be keen to avoid missing out on Jutkiewicz’s signature for the same reason.

Source

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

It all depends on Boro and how much they want for him. By the same token they may decide to keep him seeing as how he has shown his true potential.

Triumph


Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

We can't afford not to have him, were would we be now without him? bottom 3?

JohannesburgWanderer


Mario Jardel
Mario Jardel

Surely we will recoup some money from selling Sordell?

Reebok_Rebel

Reebok_Rebel
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

not a cat in hells chance will be he a Bolton player next season.

Guest


Guest

JohannesburgWanderer wrote:Surely we will recoup some money from selling Sordell?

Can't see why anybody would buy Sordell. Far from set the world alight at Charlton.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

JohannesburgWanderer wrote:Surely we will recoup some money from selling Sordell?

He might pay for a new corner flag. If they're on offer.

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

No, chance.
I see another Dawson on the horizon .

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

swap Sordell for the Juke?

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

BoltonTillIDie wrote:swap Sordell for the Juke?
Yes! Great idea!

Dougie make it happen please!!!  :pray:

luckyPeterpiper

luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

The last I heard Jutkiwicz was contracted till 2017 not 2015. But leaving that aside for one moment I personally doubt we'll sign him because Dougie will have to sell to buy. Sordell won't command a fee of any note, Cravies is not exactly beating the world at PNE and we just don't have many 'sellable' players that anyone would want in the rest of the squad. 

The bigger earners may be starting to drop off the books come summer but DF won't get all the money from that because of the sheer size of the debt we're in. 

I don't think Dougie will have as much wiggle room as some on here think because of the N'gog business. We sold him after DF was told that he could bring in someone if he did that only to be told to get rid of someone ELSE as well after the deal was done hence Cravies departure. 

I think there is a lot the board are not telling us about the finances and that no matter who the manager is the money isn't there to become a "trading club" and won't be for some considerable time yet.

doffcocker

doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

We've seen him play 13 times and think he's a world beater.
Boro fans have seen him play 71 times and think he's a useless lump.

There's something not quite right here, and I'm not saying we shouldn't think about making the deal permanent, we absolutely should. It might be that he's more suited to us than he was Boro, but it might also be that he's found some form that he could as easily lose once we've shelled out millions for him.

Guest


Guest

doffcocker wrote:We've seen him play 13 times and think he's a world beater.
Boro fans have seen him play 71 times and think he's a useless lump.

There's something not quite right here, and I'm not saying we shouldn't think about making the deal permanent, we absolutely should. It might be that he's more suited to us than he was Boro, but it might also be that he's found some form that he could as easily lose once we've shelled out millions for him.


Ah, I see........The Spearing Effect.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

No, it's called the Diouf effect.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum