And not only God. Fortunately most people are able to understand concepts with more than one premise too.Sluffy wrote:God knows what the hell you are talking about.
Takeovers - why not us?
+12
boltonbonce
karlypants
Sluffy
Wanderers for 45
Kane57
gloswhite
Natasha Whittam
BoltonTillIDie
terenceanne
wanderlust
MartinBWFC
Norpig
16 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
21 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:19
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
22 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:25
Sluffy
Admin
wanderlust wrote:And not only God. Fortunately most people are able to understand concepts with more than one premise too.Sluffy wrote:God knows what the hell you are talking about.
I'm still laughing at your premise that some random billionaire wanted to buy a minority share in the club and Anderson blocked him by asking the billionaire for a miserly five thousand to look at the books.
You're away with the fairies mate.
24 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:37
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Mods mocking posters is not on. I seriously suggest you stop it.
25 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:38
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
The Sluffy & Lusty love in continues i see
26 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:39
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Are you feeling left out or something?Natasha Whittam wrote:Mods mocking posters is not on. I seriously suggest you stop it.
27 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:40
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
It doesn't do the site any favours when one of the mods is mocking a user simply because he doesn't agree with something that was written.
28 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:45
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
it's like a battle of the ego's, neither wants to admit they're wrong
29 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:47
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
30 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:52
Sluffy
Admin
Natasha Whittam wrote:It doesn't do the site any favours when one of the mods is mocking a user simply because he doesn't agree with something that was written.
At least I'm not closing threads and even banning them like one mod I know used to do.
And even if I am gently mocking him that's nothing compared to the personal abuse of being called a fascist and a moron which he's thrown at me for simply disagreeing with him.
31 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 15:55
Sluffy
Admin
boltonbonce wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
A bit rich coming from you Bonce.
33 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:06
Sluffy
Admin
You think (or pretend to think) I'm wrong about the ST and post that I'm obsessed like Captain Ahab every time I make any reference to them.
You also think I'm wrong about banning Bread and hardly post on here since because of that, even though you clearly enjoy yourself on Nuts and everybody else wants you to keep posting.
You also think I'm wrong about banning Bread and hardly post on here since because of that, even though you clearly enjoy yourself on Nuts and everybody else wants you to keep posting.
34 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:18
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
time for a lie down and take one of your tablets Sluffy you're getting all worked up again
35 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:44
Sluffy
Admin
Norpig wrote:time for a lie down and take one of your tablets Sluffy you're getting all worked up again
Thanks for your concern but I'm not on medication just yet.
To answer one of your earlier posts I am always happy to acknowledge when I get things wrong, I'm certainly not perfect and have apologised loads of times on Nuts over the years, so it certainly isn't any ego on my part to not acknowledge when I'm in the wrong.
Anyone can have an opinion but when that opinion clashes with reality surely then it is more than likely to be wrong - agreed?
There's nothing wrong or embarrassing for an opinion not to be proved correct but to continue the façade by claiming all sorts of weird and wonderful scenarios (some even directly contradicting stuff you had said earlier) is clearly bloody minded, stupid, or simply deliberate trolling.
And it is not me that is doing this.
So I am certainly not conceited enough to be an egotist, unlike some.
36 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:53
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
All my comments to you on this thread were meant as a joke Sluffy but your radar is off these days.
Your constant baiting of Lusty and now Boncey for some strange reason does you or your website no favours
Your constant baiting of Lusty and now Boncey for some strange reason does you or your website no favours
37 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:58
Sluffy
Admin
Norpig wrote:All my comments to you on this thread were meant as a joke Sluffy but your radar is off these days.
Your constant baiting of Lusty and now Boncey for some strange reason does you or your website no favours
I'm baiting nobody mate.
I'm just telling it as it is.
38 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 16:59
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
I'm getting tired of explaining myself with regard to the ST.Sluffy wrote:You think (or pretend to think) I'm wrong about the ST and post that I'm obsessed like Captain Ahab every time I make any reference to them.
You also think I'm wrong about banning Bread and hardly post on here since because of that, even though you clearly enjoy yourself on Nuts and everybody else wants you to keep posting.
My views on the ST aren't,in fact,that much different to yours. The fun I had at your expense was because of your attitude toward them.
Anything they tried was wrong. I'm sure if they discovered a cure for blindness,you'd berate them for the disastrous effect they'd had on employment prospects in the white stick industry.
As for Breadman,yes,I,and a number of others,would prefer him to be giving it large on here,but his absence has nothing to do with the frequency of my posts.
I'm having some personal issues to deal with,and I'm posting when I can,so let's cut out this bollocks about sulking.
You really must calm down,and stop taking this so seriously.
Buy yourself some slippers.
I promise never to call you Captain Ahab again.
39 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 17:29
Sluffy
Admin
boltonbonce wrote:I'm getting tired of explaining myself with regard to the ST.Sluffy wrote:You think (or pretend to think) I'm wrong about the ST and post that I'm obsessed like Captain Ahab every time I make any reference to them.
You also think I'm wrong about banning Bread and hardly post on here since because of that, even though you clearly enjoy yourself on Nuts and everybody else wants you to keep posting.
My views on the ST aren't,in fact,that much different to yours. The fun I had at your expense was because of your attitude toward them.
Anything they tried was wrong. I'm sure if they discovered a cure for blindness,you'd berate them for the disastrous effect they'd had on employment prospects in the white stick industry.
As for Breadman,yes,I,and a number of others,would prefer him to be giving it large on here,but his absence has nothing to do with the frequency of my posts.
I'm having some personal issues to deal with,and I'm posting when I can,so let's cut out this bollocks about sulking.
You really must calm down,and stop taking this so seriously.
Buy yourself some slippers.
I promise never to call you Captain Ahab again.
I'm sorry to hear that you have been having personal issues and I'm sure everybody would wish with me that things work out speedily and favourably for you.
I know you shared similar views to myself on the ST (that's why I put it in brackets in my post above) but sometimes the joke goes on for far too long - and if you say the same thing enough times some people start to believe it to be true.
Same goes with jokes from others also, sometimes you need to put the record straight otherwise people start to believe the jokes to be real too.
As for Bread he can come back on Nuts anytime he wants providing he drops his agendas. I know you've passed on the message and he's declined but the offer still stands.
I've yet to have anything said or done to me on the many internet forums I've been on over the years to actually trouble me in real life so as I'm apparently noted for saying - I don't take it seriously - never have, never will.
I look forward to you resolving your real life issues and resuming your enjoyment of Nuts because clearly the site is much better with you than without you.
40 Re: Takeovers - why not us? Wed Sep 13 2017, 17:35
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Cheers Sluffy,your kind thoughts are appreciated.
I should add that my personal issues don't involve leg shaving.
I should add that my personal issues don't involve leg shaving.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum
|
|