[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Hard to read a Sluffy ST post with a straight face but I've invited Izza to a Q&A with fan submitted questions so let's see if he replies
I'm not sure if you are giving me a compliment or taking the piss out of me (I assume it is the latter) but I thank you anyway.
You may already have seen on this very thread that Izza did an interview with another BWFC blog site (Wanderers Station) a few days ago, which to be fair was a bit on the tame side - so I hope he does agree to do a Q&A with you at the LoV with some harder hitting questions.
If you want one off me, I would like to know why, in his capacity as the Chairman of the ST, who stated in his interview with WS that a part of the Trust role is "keeping the views of the fans in the mind of the club", that he deliberately blocked our Nuts twitter site - not for something we said on twitter - but for factually reporting his previous tweets made in the public domain about the clubs current owner - on a completely separate social media medium - namely posts made by me HERE on the Nuts forum?
Does he not believe in 'keeping the views of the fans in the mind of the ST' too
, or is he simply a hypocrite with double standards, as it seems it is ok for him to express negative opinions about the clubs owner on twitter but not for someone else to repeat them on a fans forum because they are more widely read by the whole spectrum of Wanderers supporters and which undoubtedly reflects badly on him?
As a follow up question ask him why he believes the ST should be honest, open and transparent yet he acts in a way that isn't honest, open and transparent by blocking someone (the Nuts twitter account) not for anything that was ever TWEETED but for repeating his existing tweets made in the public domain on this very FORUM!
Is blocking someone for simply repeating what you have already said an honest, open and transparent way of acting in a responsible manner?
I can't see him responding to that though - can you?
If he does give you an interview we will be happy to post it up on here also for all to read (irrespective if he answers my questions or not!).
As we don't believe in blocking and attempting to silence people simply because we don't always agree with then.