Norpig wrote:I didn't answer your question as i've lost the will to live with the both of you.
If you two want to continue to wreck the site for the rest of us then carry on regardless.
I don't want to wreck the site though - don't you understand that?
Look this is simple over the years Wanderlust posts something and I shoot it down as being factually wrong. He can't for whatever reasons he has, admit to being wrong and as he can't refute what I've said to be wrong he try's to discredit me on a personal level.
That's what as been going on for years - Wanderlust posts bollocks - I shoot them down and he attacks me on a personal level.
I respond the to the personal attacks by laughing at him and quoting back some of the stupidity he's spouted over the years - the £268m, the knowing how government works based on him working in a non government organisation and so on.
It's got to the state when this had to end when Karly left the site, so I pledged not to laugh at Wanderlust if he kept to his side of the fence.
The thing is though he simply can't.
Look what's happened above - he says something far fetched about FV's financial position and future planning and I post to show him what the reality is of the position they are actually in!
He can't accept to be seen to be wrong hence his outburst and abuse.
Just look at what he even says in his last rant (let's put the abuse to one side - although it would have been nice if you or others had called him out for it as being quite unnecessary and not warranted).
Basically what he says is that it's ok for him to say anything (pigs might fly for instance) but even though he says it he doesn't believe it to be true himself.
Using that logic it is quite alright in his world to post stuff that I've completely shown to be false logic (or incorrect analysis, or whatever he thinks it is) but on being shown how wrong it is, claims that he didn't necessarily believe what he had said had any merit it the first place - ie pigs can't fly.
Why say such things if he doesn't believe them?
The thing though is that he thought they were viable at the time of him posting them - but since reading how things really are simply can't accept that he was wrong - hence the wacky logic as to why he said them in the first place (plus the abuse).
It's no big deal saying he was wrong, nor saying I was right BUT he can't bring himself to do that.
That's the core of the problem and has been for years.
I've not minded laughing at him over the years but clearly that cycle now needs to be broken and can only be done so when he realises that he does get things wrong - and the rest of us can see he does too!
It's personal on his side and it needs to be recognised by everyone on here as such.
I don't mind he calls me names - water off a ducks back really BUT I know that it needs to STOP if we are to put an end to this - that's why I've been saying that after four years of it, it now has to end if there is going to be any chance of ending this feud.
He needs to take responsibility of what he writes - if he gets things wrong (and we all do) then he needs to accept that and move on and not keep making out that it's all some sort of a personal vendetta by me against him!
It's not and never has been.
He simply doesn't like to be seen to be wrong and he doesn't like to be laughed at.
So all that is needed is for him to wind his neck in when he is mistaken and not perpetuate the cycle.
It's not going to end otherwise unless one of us leaves for good is it?
So it would help immensely if others called him out for his behaviour instead of seeing me as the baddie in all of this all of the time.
Home
