The mod position.

We've all just found out that Triumph is Sluffy's son, but I'm not on about that, I'm on about he was secretly given the mods job without an interview letter going out, to the general oddballs on here.

After deleting my posts last night he is no longer a respected member of the team, "still waiting for my apology , and free fairground pass".

Anyway, other than being Sluffy's son, what was the criteria for the mods job, and was he the only person that you interviewed .

It's an out rage.

No, it's an outrage. (One word.)

Thought you said you were the cleverest bloke on here?

I am going back to BA, this is disgusting jobs for the boys Y did we not have a vote. 

Shut up Bread, this is serious.

Sorry, Magoo.

I think you should be a mod.

At the very least the mod job should have gone to the most respected member with the most posts.

Insulting that there wasn't even a vote or interview process.

I may sue.

scottjames30 wrote:We've all just found out that Triumph is Sluffy's son

Is this true Scott?

karlypants wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:We've all just found out that Triumph is Sluffy's son

Is this true Scott?

It is part of the UKIP Euro-elections manifesto!

It should also be made public why Karlypants was made a mod. What does he have that Magoo doesn't?

Me and Breadman would be good mods, we could ban each other.

KP would never be a mod before me, I'd get the union involved .

scottjames30 wrote:KP would never be a mod before me, I'd get the union involved .

He's already a mod you plonker.

Natasha Whittam wrote:It should also be made public why Karlypants was made a mod. What does he have that Magoo doesn't?

Ah! but I'm not a mod though am I.   

Natasha Whittam wrote:At the very least the mod job should have gone to the most respected member with the most posts.

Insulting that there wasn't even a vote or interview process.

I may sue.

You can't hold any position of authority on here because you're a bird and once a month for about five days you would get all "tired and emotional" and start banning people willy-nilly and deleting stuff left, right and centre for no reason.

Then you'd cry and apologise to everyone before eating eight bars of chocolate.

Sorry.

Breadman wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:At the very least the mod job should have gone to the most respected member with the most posts.

Insulting that there wasn't even a vote or interview process.

I may sue.

You can't hold any position of authority on here because you're a bird and once a month for about five days you would get all "tired and emotional" and start banning people willy-nilly and deleting stuff left, right and centre for no reason.

Then you'd cry and apologise to everyone before eating eight bars of chocolate.

Sorry.

  

So one day, all this could be Triumph's?

Breadman wrote:

You can't hold any position of authority on here because you're a bird and once a month for about five days you would get all "tired and emotional" and start banning people willy-nilly and deleting stuff left, right and centre for no reason.

Then you'd cry and apologise to everyone before eating eight bars of chocolate.

Sorry.

You heartless bastard. I haven't had a period since Nuggy burnt off my fanny.

Breadman wrote:No, it's an outrage. (One word.)

Thought you said you were the cleverest bloke on here?

I am.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:KP would never be a mod before me, I'd get the union involved .

He's already a mod you plonker.