Should boggers be re-instated

Make your choice wisely

Two votes and no comments.  Spineless people. Come on.  Nail your colours to the mast

I'm not nailing that again after last time.

Dont lie.  Youll nail anything that moves you dirty fecker.   4 posts in and gay sex starts.  Is that a new record?

it only let me have one vote

I've voted yes just to see bread2.0 start a tearful attention seeking I'm leaving nuts thread followed seven days later by bread3.0backwithmytailbetweenmylegsagain

1 vote per person im afraid pig

y2johnny wrote:Dont lie.  Youll nail anything that moves you dirty fecker.   4 posts in and gay sex starts.  Is that a new record?

No Nat started a thread with it, can't think why

Norpig wrote:it only let me have one vote

And how many do you need?

Clickbait.

Boggers wouldn't come back without Scott, you underestimate how reliant he was for 'support'.

So he'll forever be remembered as a rat.

Bye Boggers!

karlypants wrote:

Norpig wrote:it only let me have one vote

And how many do you need?

sorry, misread Johnnys second comment, i took it to mean we had 2 votes not that 2 votes had already been cast 

Seems Scott is already back - see the Noisy Neighbour thread.

xmiles wrote:Seems Scott is already back - see the Noisy Neighbour thread.

See comment No40 from Kim Jung Sluffy:

https://forum.boltonnuts.co.uk/t14598p30-bring-back-boggers

Actually, the North Korean reference is inaccurate - This desperate appeasement rubbish is more akin to Neville Chamberlain and his piece of paper....

Surely North Korean dictator references should be reserved for someone who bans people and doesn't give second chances, you were temporarily banned and then reinstated so the same should surely apply elsewhere.
You appear to be the one trying to dictate the terms here while Sluffy is trying to keep an open mind.

Climb out, FFS.....

Bread2.0 wrote:Climb out, FFS.....

Ah the stereotypical response of the ignorant with nothing reasonable to counter with.

y2johnny wrote:Two votes and no comments.  Spineless people. Come on.  Nail your colours to the mast

Perhaps your response is a reason people don't want to vote. I would have thought that setting up a poll such as this you would have had some form of neutrality. I'm too spineless to vote thus spoiling my own vote.

whatsgoingon wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:Climb out, FFS.....

Ah the stereotypical response of the ignorant with nothing reasonable to counter with.

No, I just think you're boring and you seem to like taking little digs at me - A bit like (the) Boggersbelief (character) used to spend a lot of his time doing.

You've done it a fair bit recently so you clearly want a reaction.

Well, there you go.

Happy now?