OFFICIAL CLUB SOLD TO FV!!!!!

Sluffy wrote:Bob.

1 - You have no idea how much Anderson had or has in the bank.
Unlike you, I have never claimed I did know. But I do know that on every occasion, that I am aware of, when KA needed money he borrowed it.

Sluffy wrote:
2 - You have no explanation as to why Anderson took on a loan that left him exposed and personally liable for £7.5m.
I do believe that I understand all the arrangements Eddie and Ken entered into and the reasons for each of them doing so. It would take a lengthy explanation to deal with it all and I am not sure that I want to embark on all of that.

Sluffy wrote:
3 - You have no explanation as to why Eddie leant him that in the first place (particularly that you seem to be insisting that Anderson didn't possess £7.5m worth of wealth to even pay him back!!!)
See 2. above

Sluffy wrote:
4 - You have no idea of WHY the Administrator did what he did - your narrative is based entirely on the position AFTER he made his decision - the Administrator could for all you know have based his decision on LEGALITY (Insolvency legislation) rather than CONSPIRACY (to screw Anderson)
I do believe I know why the Administrator did what he did but, in this case,  I am not going to spell it out here for legal reasons.

Sluffy wrote:
5 - Why would a representative of the High Court, care, join in with and act directly in accordance with a perceived hatred of Davies and Anderson by the local rag that dated back some thirty years???
You have lost the plot, not for the first time I have to say.

Sluffy wrote:
6 - You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink.  You can be absolutely correct on everything you believe had happened, spell it out and nail it to everyone's foreheads BUT you still won't stop them HATING whoever and whatever THEY want to hate!!!
Numpties will always be numpties but not everyone is a numpty. The vast majority have little to go on and many let emotion or prejudice get in the way of rational thought.

Sluffy wrote:
Christ Bob for an obviously clever person you clearly don't understand basic human behaviour.

I have advised and otherwise had dealings with hundreds of businessmen over many years and so I know how they think, I know how they behave, I know the law, I know the procedures and the protocols and I can usually sniff out a falsehood, a charlatan or a dodgy practice at a thousand paces.

Sluffy wrote:
Why do you think the world is as fucked up as it is - let alone BWFC's recent historical history???

The world is full of prejudice. Always has been and always will be.

boltonbonce wrote:Good read in WSC if you can get hold of a copy.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

boltonbonce wrote:Anderson said he'd come on. Then he wouldn't because he was in a meeting. Then he said if some questions were emailed he'd consider answering them. To be honest I don't want to hear from him, because I don't believe a word that comes out of his arse.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
May I respectfully refer you to the answer to Sluffy's Question 6.

i.e. Numpties will always be numpties.

 Numpty and Norpig do seem to go together rather well, if you don't mind me saying so.

Norpig wrote:
I do mind so i refer you to my previous reply

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Ten Bobsworth wrote:And Sluffy, sad to say but I do believe you to be irrational and delusional and have been getting worse with each week that passes.

Dementia would seriously have set in if I was to take on every daft idea you keep coming up with.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
Are you off work today or just having a long lunch hour?

Would that be a sloth?

Do you think the NHS might need reform? Some folk do.

Sluffy wrote:

You can think of me what you like Bob, words don't hurt me.

I don't really understand what you are trying to get out of all this, you simply don't know why the Administrator did what he did - believing you know what he did simply is not the same - and you know that.
What the Administrators did is fully recorded and its clear what effect it would have and did have. Plainly there was a plan. Who came up with it is unknown but evidently it didn't work and set in train a chain of events that made the Administration more protracted, disputatious and costly.

Did the Admins anticipate having no issues? Had something similar  been tried in another case without any problem? Who knows?

Supposing he/they  had been challenged in a Court of Law on why the £5million had not been included in the Statement of Affairs. The facts were clear, the legal charges had been properly and professionally recorded. What would the defence have been?

It was all very complicated and an unfortunate  misunderstanding because a bookkeeper hadn't completed a journal entry? I'm sorry but they would have to come up with something better than that if anyone competent was in the Chair.

Even if you are right, it won't change anything that had happened and won't change the hatred for Ken (and to a lesser extent Eddie).

Their hatred is irrational and will remain to be irrational no matter what you ever say.

You have no end game in all of this, you are trapped in a loop of your own making.

Telling me constantly that I am floundering and all the other stuff you chuck at me is akin to Wanderlust lying and contorting himself so as to not face the reality that you have both fallen into your self delusional worlds that don't confirm to reality - Wanderlust in the sense that he was wrong but won't admit it and you that even though you may be right, will still never change how some people will continue to hate Anderson until the day they die.

The way out is easy, Wanderlust simply to accept he was wrong or had made and error, and you to face up to the fact that people hate irrationally and without due cause to.

Neither of you can face doing that though.

The problems are of your own makings and not that I'm some sort of a cunt who is out to get you, or whatever it is you believe me to be.

I think you are muddying the water, Sluffy, and becoming more and more delusional in your attempts to deny it. I don't mind if you are a lost cause, my comments are aimed at anyone with their listening ears and thinking heads on. That has always been the case and I am not easily fobbed off.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:What the Administrators did is fully recorded and its clear what effect it would have and did have. Plainly there was a plan. Who came up with it is unknown but evidently it didn't work and set in train a chain of events that made the Administration more protracted, disputatious and costly.

Did the Admins anticipate having no issues? Had something similar  been tried in another case without any problem? Who knows?

Supposing he/they  had been challenged in a Court of Law on why the £5million had not been included in the Statement of Affairs. The facts were clear, the legal charges had been properly and professionally recorded.  What would the defence have been?

It was all very complicated and an unfortunate  misunderstanding because a bookkeeper hadn't completed a journal entry? I'm sorry but they would have to come up with something better than that if anyone competent was in the Chair.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:I think you are muddying the water, Sluffy, and becoming more and more delusional in your attempts to deny it. I don't mind if you are a lost cause, my comments are aimed at anyone with their listening ears and thinking heads on. That has always been the case and I am not easily fobbed off.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:And maybe Sluffy will tell us about this £2million figure that he got from some unnamed, but 'trusted' source.

Sluffy wrote:

???

What are you about?

Nobody's given me £2m, nor likely ever will!

As for something I may have posted over FOUR YEARS AGO, I can't remember what I said, or why I said it and frankly I'm past the point of troubling myself to trawl back through threads to refresh my memory in order to amuse you with an explanation of why I said what I did back then.

Frankly I can't give a fuck whether I was right or wrong at the time - it simply is irrelevant now as everything has since been completed, tied up and finalised and everybody BUT YOU have moved on from it.

NOBODY CARES BOB.

You are left alone now with only your obsession and imaginary hordes of followers to keep you company.