Conspiracy theories

He was very scary, but he has gone.

wanderlust wrote:I thought we'd agreed that nobody knows who was right or wrong as we weren't and aren't privy to the requisite information?

I still believe Anderson robbed us blind but in the absence of conclusive evidence either way felt OK about dropping the matter.

Eh, we know loads!

We know a crime has not been committed because nobody has been arrested.

We know he's run the company in accordance with the law because he's not been barred from being a Director following it.

Believe what you want but it certainly doesn't tally with the Administrators reports after seeing the accounts - which are in the public domain, so we do know more than what you like to make out.

We also know from those reports that the business didn't have the funds to pay the players and they were not paid under Administration by the Administrator until the club was sold.

Again I'm not sure how Anderson was supposed to pay everyone when there wasn't any money to do so?

We also know how much it cost to run the club during the Administration period - and that amounted to a loss!

Indeed FV were even asked to put £1m into the pot as a non returnable payment just to stop the club from folding during Administration!

We'll know it all once the 'old' club is finally liquidated and the Administrator makes full disclosure.

No doubt you'll still be in denial about Anderson even then!

Sluffy wrote:

Eh, we know loads!

We know a crime has not been committed because nobody has been arrested.

Logic based on the premise that all crimes are solved?
Try telling that to the thousands of rape victims who never see their attackers arrested.

A new low.

wanderlust wrote:

Sluffy wrote:

Eh, we know loads!

We know a crime has not been committed because nobody has been arrested.

Logic based on the premise that all crimes are solved?
Try telling that to the thousands of rape victims who never see their attackers arrested.

A new low.

What???

You have to have a crime in the first place for it to be solved, or did your 'logic' not think of that in your rush to post what you did???

Let me put it as simply as I can for you -

Nearly 15 months after leaving the club and the agents of the court (the Administrator) was appointed and forensically examined the books and the running of the business by the Directors, no crime has been reported!!!!

If no crime has taken place then no one can be arrested for something that never happened can they?

Is that any easier for you to understand?

T.R.O.Y. wrote:

There's plenty who post on social media who believe the earth's flat, they're called crackpots you shouldn't bother listening to them.

No fan (especially of our club) should expect constant success, but the off pitch drama was embarrassing at times, and not paying club staff was handled very poorly.

As I said, if it's a surprise to you that Anderson's tenure is not viewed in a positive light by the fans then you don't understand football.

Shit fan

T.R.O.Y. wrote:Been through this a number of times with you, you ignore it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

I can only remember one poster on here(and a minority of social media nuts who should be ignored) who claimed Anderson was acting illegally. 

The issue was that his running of the club had us all talking about finances, the morality of his actions rather than the on-pitch performances of our club.

If you can't understand why football fans got upset about that then you don't understand the sport.

Name and shame

Right I’ve had enough, I’m going to arrange a straightener between Lusty and Sluffy. Getting on my tits 

I’m also taking bets 

Lusty 10/1
Sluffy 16/1
The pair of them saying a few naughty words to each other and retreating back to their armchairs EVENS

Is it going to be one of those white collar boxing matches or a no holds barred gypsy style tear up Boggers? 

Bare knuckle and no weapons

Boggersbelief wrote:Bare knuckle and no weapons

 Now we're talking, we need someone to live stream it to the portal 

Mo

BoltonTillIDie wrote:Mo

No he can't do it his speakers don't work! I want to hear all the thuds and groans from the pair of them.

Norpig wrote:
No he can't do it his speakers don't work! I want to hear all the thuds and groans from the pair of them.

Nat's got a lot of video equipment in her bedroom for some reason, maybe we could borrow it.

boltonbonce wrote:
Nat's got a lot of video equipment in her bedroom for some reason, maybe we could borrow it.

 It'll need a good wipe down first i reckon but should be ok. Does anyone still use Betamax though?

Norpig wrote:
 It'll need a good wipe down first i reckon but should be ok. Does anyone still use Betamax though?

What's Betamax? I'm still using this.

Boggersbelief wrote:Right I’ve had enough, I’m going to arrange a straightener between Lusty and Sluffy. Getting on my tits 

I’m also taking bets 

Lusty 10/1
Sluffy 16/1
The pair of them saying a few naughty words to each other and retreating back to their armchairs EVENS

Well said, Boggers! Tedious petty squabbles. Undignified stuff.

You're quite right Okocha, undignified, however, I would also like to add, 'as boring as bollocks'. Not the most erudite of comments, but it's how I feel 

Grow up the lot of you.
I'm not squabbling - merely pointing out that illogical nonsense is no basis for a lengthy diatribe. Done deal, job done, it's all over now.