boltonbonce wrote:Here we go again. Lusty must be back.
Oh, wait............
![Very Happy](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_biggrin.png)
boltonbonce wrote:Here we go again. Lusty must be back.
Oh, wait............
Sluffy wrote:
![]()
Hahahaha!!!!
Have you learned nothing at all from what I've said over the years about believing something from social media without checking it out as true first?
Clearly you've learnt bugger all.
Who is behind the 'A Different Bias' You Tube channel and what is it about?
Well it is a bloke called Phil Moorhouse a Science teacher who lives in Scunthorpe and it is about HIS political 'views'.
What do we know about 'Phil' - well he clearly hates the Tories.
Is what he says fair comment - well I said in early 2020 that the awarding of PPE contracts is done by Civil Servants and not politicians so there simply can't be any "Tory nepotism/cronyism/corruption" and I predicted then that no one would ever produce a smoking gun to prove that there ever was.
To date nearly THREE YEARS LATER - despite everyone desperately looking to pin something on the Tories absolutely nothing has been found.
Nor will it as it simply doesn't exist.
Why then is 'Phil' banging on about it then?
It's because he's talks shit that muppets like you want to hear and now has 156,000 subscribers to his You Tube Channel.
How much does a subscription cost?
I don't know but let's say just £10 for the year.
If so 'Phil' has earned just over £1.5m this year from idiots similar to you who want to hear the shite he talks about because you want to believe that it is true.
He's simply telling you and his 156,000 subscribers what you/they want to hear and laughing all the way to the bank with your money - what is it they say about a fool and his money being easily parted!
I hope for your own sake you aren't a subscriber of 'Phil's'.
Fwiw Maugham 'grifted' over £4m from mugs like you doing exactly the same thing on Twitter.
The more outrageous stuff 'Phil' and Maugham spouts, the more subscriptions they receive.
Don't you get it?
Clearly you don't.
You just want it all to be true.
And it simply isn't.
https://www.youtube.com/c/ADifferentBias/about
https://www.facebook.com/PhilM76/
Can understand HP's utter frustration at his treatment, especially as the option of pressing the "Ignore" button does not exist in this case.Natasha Whittam wrote:Bwfc1958BanksofcroalxmilesGloswhiteMartinBWFCwanderlustHip Priest
Cajun
WS63
Bonce
Norpig
Natasha
Sluffy's getting rid of us one by one. Stay on your toes.
p.s. Don't do it HP, I'll miss your musical taste.
HP is the Tom Waits of Nuts, appearing in the early hours, through a haze of cigarette smoke, and with a powerful hint of Jack Daniels pervading the gloom.okocha wrote:
Can understand HP's utter frustration at his treatment, especially as the option of pressing the "Ignore" button does not exist in this case.
He is/was a valuable, respected, interesting poster.
Hip Priest wrote:Did my post warrant that rude and aggressive reply?
Especially from someone who is supposed to be serving a self imposed ban for being rude and aggressive.
He's just called me a "muppet," an "idiot" and a "mug" and says I am basically stupid because I don't agree with his opinions and I should know really that he is always right about everything.
The point I made was hotly debated in the commons so obviously the Government has explaining to do.
This site is in a mess. He thinks he can abuse whoever he wants, whenever he wants with no consequence. And he's right. What's the point of posting on a forum if you're likely to receive unwarranted abuse from the site owner if he doesn't share your views. I've really tried hard to ignore him but it doesn't work for me. He winds me up and I get drawn in.
I've got no ambitions to be Wanderlust 2.0
Goodbye,
finlaymcdanger wrote:This has started to become disturbingly weird. Victim after victim after victim.
boltonbonce wrote:Stupidity is the norm, Sluffy. Look at religion.
Not a shred of evidence, yet they'll kill and die for it.
Hip Priest wrote:Like everyone else, I can't be bothered reading your usual "sermon on the mount" drivel and even if I did it wouldn't change my thinking about this one bit. We've got completely different opinions about this as we discovered before.
I did notice that you've only called me crazy for holding my opinion this time. Not quite as bad as last time.
You just don't fucking learn do you. Believe it or not Sluffy, different people hold different opinions and sometimes you may just be wrong about things. As you have stated many times you clearly believe your beloved "Guardians of the Universe" civil service chappies can't be outsmarted by Tory ministers out to make a quick buck for themselves and their buddies. You probably still believe in the Tooth Fairy too.
I'll make a deal with you now.
If this is ever investigated properly and everything about this is found to be completely above board I will come on here and humbly apologise to you and admit I made a right tit of myself by suggesting such underhanded things could possibly happen under a Tory Government where such rigorous civil service controls would preclude this from happening.
Can you give me the same promise if my ridiculous suspicions about this matter turn out to be well founded.
Can you cope with admitting you were wrong about something?
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum