Euros 2020 - in 2021

Ten Bobsworth wrote:I couldn't help noticing, on the Robin's Nest site last Saturday, that one of the posters abused another by calling him a 'prick' with some other offensive adjective to add colour but leading to an outbreak of  internet handbags. All offending posts were removed, the next day I think, by the mods.

boltonbonce wrote:
Robin's Nest?

Explain yourself, or feel the weight of my glove upon your cheek.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
Robins Nest is the forum of Cheltenham Town FC, Boncey. They have a poster called Royal Cheltenham Spa (RCS) who may share some of your views but, quite unlike you, seems devoid of any SOH. He thinks that because some folk in big business 'tweak' their accounts everyone in business is up to no good so why pick on Dale Vince?

Another poster CTFC-fan thinks RCS is a 'prick' and is one of several who wanted to no more about 'stale mince', Egotricity and FGR's financial dealings.

boltonbonce wrote:
Ah, I'd assumed you'd become enamoured of the 70's sitcom of the same name, starring Richard O'Sullivan, who played a cafe owner. He also employed a one armed dish washer, the gloriously Irish, David Kelly.
Never took to it myself, but it was popular at the time.
With regard to this Cheltenham Spa chap, he's probably typical of a lot of lefties I know. Big on slogans, thin on ideas.
And don't get me started on my fellow vegans.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
I never took to it either, Boncey. It might have been better than I'd imagined it was.

I had never taken to Ever Decreasing Circles but now when I watch it, as I occasionally do with Lady B, it was really very good.

Sluffy wrote:

If you can point me in the direction of any of the above that have led to a direct prosecution then I'd be more than happy to warn Bonce, Karly or anyone else to stop their use of it - which, if you care to remember was all that I was actually asking from Wanderlust.

finlaymcdanger wrote:

Sluffy wrote:

If you can point me in the direction of any of the above that have led to a direct prosecution then I'd be more than happy to warn Bonce, Karly or anyone else to stop their use of it - which, if you care to remember was all that I was actually asking from Wanderlust.

Not my purpose so I won’t bother but it’s highly unlikely that Lusty describing the Welsh as “sheep mitherers” or “ovine-phile” could lead to prosecution without further context because neither indicate the intention to actually penetrate sheep.

You’ve made your decision and also stated other reasons for banning Wanderlust so I’ll drop it. I just think it could have been resolved differently.

Sluffy wrote:And before everyone else kicks off ask yourself the question do you think this shit will ever stop otherwise?

Someone has to put an end to this and I finally have.

Cajunboy wrote:The Woke Army are creating a very miserable world for themselves with all this nonsense.

boltonbonce wrote:
Lusty's ok. He's gone to the pictures.

Sheepless In Seattle. So, all's wool that ends wool.

Sluffy wrote:

Do you think the bloke who used the phrase 'sheep shaggers' was prosecuted for the "intention to actually penetrate sheep"?

Of course he wasn't it how he used it as an insult that is now no longer deemed acceptable.

Yes maybe Wanderlust didn't use the exact words, nor used them in a derogatory meaning but if he had used the 'N' word in a semantic jocular way, would that have been acceptable?

Well would it?

I asked SIX times over TWO WEEKS for him to pack it in.

He was never going to do so was he???

I stated my exact reason for his ban at the time.

Enough was enough.

He brought the ban upon himself.

Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

It certainly wasn't me that acted unreasonably here, so don't make out that I've turned him into some sort of a martyr.

He fully deserved what he got and I have no regrets having done so.

As I said at the time...

finlaymcdanger wrote:There was zero malice in my post, Sluffy. Don’t presume everyone is out to get you just because they may offer an opinion that differs from yours. Like I said, the subject is closed for me.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Sluffy wrote:


Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

boltonbonce wrote:
It was superb. Howard and Hilda are a joy.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
I couldn't agree more but I kind of knew you would like it, Boncey. Maybe we've touched on this subject before.

Norpig wrote:

Sluffy wrote:
Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

 I've said on many occasions you were as bad as each other so feel free to check back on that. As i said before the whole sheep shagger thing is just the excuse you needed to ban him as you've been looking to do it for a long time. If you knew he was winding you up why did you feel the need to always answer him?

Sluffy wrote:Clearly both have issues that transcends a random internet footy forum whose only purpose is to talk about the club we all follow.

The solution to all this is easy.

They can ignore my posts, they can disagree but draw a line under it and move on, or they can go and post on another forum.

The question is, why don't they?

boltonbonce wrote:Let's all take a step back.