Referendum rules should be this...

bwfc1874 wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.

You haven't, you are a liar

You've changed your 'persona' more recently but there was a time when you absolutely did do all of those things. 

But again it's irrelevant to my question of why you spend so much time defending and supporting Scott.

I treat people how they treat me. Scott has always been friendly to me and I do think a group of the same people gang up on him, even when he's not in the wrong and when it has nothing to do with them.

whatsgoingon wrote:

Breadman wrote:Boggers,

Bit of honest advice:

You're too close to whoever's behind the Scott character and you need to put some distance between you for your own good.

My last comment was more aimed at him because he's a nasty fucker and your shtick's a bit more palatable / less offensive than his.

You're obviously not stupid but you're being played and you're making yourself look like a cunt by constantly backing the prick up.

There's a line and that cunt consistently crosses it on here.

Don't let the sad wanker drag you over it with him.

Good post and if you could back it up by acknowledging bringing KPs wife into it was also wrong then maybe this unpleasantness can be forgotten.

Erm....no.

I stand by what I posted and I'd do it again.

I wasn't abusive and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me why saying that his wife's not English was worthy of a ban.

Breadman doesn't apologise, he's always the victim, never a wrong doing in his mind, he knows it deep down though , that's why he's gone silent though , he'll never own up to his own mistakes, though, that's not in his amour .

Boggersbelief wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.

You haven't, you are a liar

You've changed your 'persona' more recently but there was a time when you absolutely did do all of those things. 

But again it's irrelevant to my question of why you spend so much time defending and supporting Scott.

I treat people how they treat me. Scott has always been friendly to me and I do think a group of the same people gang up on him, even when he's not in the wrong and when it has nothing to do with them.

I've not in my short time on here had any unpleasantness with Scott and found him ok, but this isn't acceptable. If the referendum result affects people off line as it has here then we really are fucked. Surely time to move on in the same direction

Breadman wrote:

whatsgoingon wrote:

Breadman wrote:Boggers,

Bit of honest advice:

You're too close to whoever's behind the Scott character and you need to put some distance between you for your own good.

My last comment was more aimed at him because he's a nasty fucker and your shtick's a bit more palatable / less offensive than his.

You're obviously not stupid but you're being played and you're making yourself look like a cunt by constantly backing the prick up.

There's a line and that cunt consistently crosses it on here.

Don't let the sad wanker drag you over it with him.

Good post and if you could back it up by acknowledging bringing KPs wife into it was also wrong then maybe this unpleasantness can be forgotten.

Erm....no.

I stand by what I posted and I'd do it again.

I wasn't abusive and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me why saying that his wife's not English was worthy of a ban.

It was wrong because it brought his real life into a forum disagreement whether abusively or not. So to take the position you have on Scotts comments is hypocrisy

Don't take the prick on mate, I've summarised him and he is one nasty tosser, somebody sent him a death threat once by Google , he accused me of it.

It wasn't me, and he did apologise to me, it just shows he's hated outside the forum world, must be a nasty twat.

whatsgoingon wrote:
It was wrong because it brought his real life into a forum disagreement whether abusively or not. So to take the position you have on Scotts comments is hypocrisy

So if I was a mod and I'd made it public that I drove a Ford Escort and I loved it.....


.....but then I suddenly spent a few weeks saying how shit Fords were and how the country would be better off if we stopped people buying Fords (despite my still owning and driving one).........

.....and someone said: "Hang on.....Don't you drive a Ford?"

....and I banned them without explaining why and called them a "bitter bastard" and a "cunt".....


Would that be considered normal, rational behaviour?

Give it a rest.

KP openly stated he had a foreign wife. Breadman repeated it.

I don't see any problem at all.

The ban was a joke.

Moral of the story, if you don't want your personal life mentioned on the internet, don't post about it on a public form.

But KP never posted it on a public forum, he did it by PM?

scottjames30 wrote:But KP never posted it on a public forum, he did it by PM?

No he didn't, he posted it on the open forum.

Show me.

Biggie's gonna go postal when he sees his thread's been hijacked this badly. 

Expect multiple bans and the odd hospitalisation.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:But KP never posted it on a public forum, he did it by PM?

No he didn't, he posted it on the open forum.

This is true. I've never been told by pm but I knew he had a Thai mrs.

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:But KP never posted it on a public forum, he did it by PM?

No he didn't, he posted it on the open forum.

This is true. I've never been told by pm but I knew he had a Thai mrs.

Even so, is that really a sad excuse to back an argument up with a so called mate.

It's fucking low, can you understand that bit, at least?

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:But KP never posted it on a public forum, he did it by PM?

No he didn't, he posted it on the open forum.

This is true. I've never been told by pm but I knew he had a Thai mrs.

Unless he told someone about it by PM who then released I wasn't around which seems to be more than possible. However I still think it's wrong to use it in an argument and to compare it to what car someone drives is even more offensive.

Spot on lad, you'll soon get to know his Mard rants, and stupid behaviour, but you'll just end up laughing and taking the piss out of the prick, he's in a world of his own and talks jab.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Moral of the story, if you don't want your personal life mentioned on the internet, don't post about it on a public form.

That's a fair point and recent events have probably taught him that, but still no need to use it in the context it was used.
As an aside it also damages Breadmans point because on one hand he's saying KP is racist for voting out and wanting to control immigration and on the other hand acknowledging that he is clearly not racist if he's married to someone foreign.

Personally, I think it was an overreaction and Breaders getting banned wasn't called for but from KP's point of view I can see how it would hit a nerve. 

The fact is, it should have been nipped in the bud straight away. 

The conversation could have been simple:

kp: Sorry I banned you there Breaders, I overreacted a bit and it was a knee jerk reaction to having my wife brought into an argument. 

Breaders: it's ok mate, I was just trying to prove a point but I can see why you could get offended by what was said. I'm sorry I offended you that wasn't my intention. 

Kp: Love you Breaders. 

Breaders: Love you too mate. 

There we go, done and dusted.

scottjames30 wrote:Spot on lad, you'll soon get to know his Mard rants, and stupid behaviour, but you'll just end up laughing and taking the piss out of the prick, he's in a world of his own and talks jab.

So don't sink to that level mate, from previous interactions with you you seem a decent poster but some of the stuff you've put on here and the PM (if real) is taking it lower.