So much for parliamentary democracy

Some of the Brexiteers are more Mein Kampf than Camp Men.

I like Camp Coffee

I like Camp Coffee

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

It's a good thing that SOMEone is principled enough and determined enough to stand up for what is right despite death threats and vicious, uncouth vitriol.

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

Are the courts wrong is the question you need to answer.

Because unless you think they are she has every right to challenge the governments actions when they are unlawful - as we all do.

okocha wrote:

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

It's a good thing that SOMEone is principled enough and determined enough to stand up for what is right despite death threats and vicious, uncouth vitriol.

This is true, and I'm glad to see Boris is continuing to keep to his word to all those who voted to leave.

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

Are the courts wrong is the question you need to answer.

Because unless you think they are she has every right to challenge the governments actions when they are unlawful - as we all do.

Indeed. Lets hope she uses her millions to tackle cases where the ordinary citizen needs help. We know there's absolutely no chance of that, so maybe we should ask why she is choosing the high profile cases she goes for.

gloswhite wrote: I'm glad to see Boris is continuing to keep to his word to all those who voted to leave.

That's not true. We were promised an "easy to negotiate" trade deal similar to Norway and Switzerland - both of whom have deals with the EU.


And those promises were reiterated AFTER the referendum....




"Getting out of the EU can be quick and easy – the UK holds most of the cards"


John Redwood

July 17 2016


"The free trade agreement that we will have to do with the European Union should be one of the easiest in human history"



Liam Fox

20 July 2017



So rather than keeping the promises made to Leave voters, Boris is doing everything he can to avoid keeping them in his relentless - and illegal - pursuit of leaving without a deal.


Some other promises to Leave voters that have already been broken:

• "Trade talks would take place in parallel with divorce talks" (Davis caved in on Day 1)
  
• "The UK does not need a transition period and would not be subject to EU rules or budgets during one" (We immediately started an initial 21 month transition - since extended - and have been subject to EU rules and budgets throughout)
  
• "The transition serves merely to implement the final trade deal which would be agreed by Brexit Day" - you have got to be kidding!!!!
  
• "The UK would owe the EU nothing after we leave in March 2019" (Government told the EU in November 2017 that we would honour our share of all commitments)
  
• "A raft of new trade deals will be ready on the 29th March 2019" (Government has conceded that any new trade deals we negotiate with third party countries - where are they?  - cannot be implemented until AFTER December 2020)
  
• "A hi-tech customs solution will make frictionless borders simple" (that's going well)
  
• "Free movement will end on the 29th March 2019" LOL
  
• "Britain will take back control of it's fisheries" (EU continues to have free access to British waters and has demanded that they will continue to have access as a condition of any deal struck with EU countries)
  
  

NB: Apologies for the italics but I can't get rid of 'em.

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

gloswhite wrote:She just loves the limelight. Did anyone notice her when she entered the Supreme courts in the pissing rain. She had a flunky holding an umbrella for her, whilst he was getting soaked. Royalty indeed, (in her own mind).

If it’s just a stunt for attention why has she won twice?

Why is she even involved?

Are the courts wrong is the question you need to answer.

Because unless you think they are she has every right to challenge the governments actions when they are unlawful - as we all do.

Indeed. Lets hope she uses her millions to tackle cases where the ordinary citizen needs help. We know there's absolutely no chance of that, so maybe we should ask why she is choosing the high profile cases she goes for.

I mean clearly you have a personal issue with this woman you’ve never met.

But unless you’re trying to tell me that the courts were wrong twice then she’s fully justified in her actions. It’s not some spurious case she’s brought forward to get some limelight as you seen desperate to believe.

If you took facts over your own prejudice more often you’d hold very different views.

The court has no right interfearing, same with that Fuck Head Bercow.

Angry Dad wrote:The court has no right interfearing, same with that Fuck Head Bercow.

The court have no right to apply the law.

What a stupid thing to say.

Angry Dad wrote:The court has no right interfearing, same with that Fuck Head Bercow.

The British Parliament and the British Legal system should really just stand aside whilst a bunch of foreign businessmen and their puppet American-born Prime Minister take over Britain? Really?

We should be fighting them on the beaches.

Bloody hell, all our prejudices are on show now. This really is getting too involved, with apparently none of us prepared to give much credence to others when they don't agree completely with our own views. A lot like our politicians really, who who condemn for the same responses.

TROY, do you realise how little credibility you have when you come up with comments like this; 
" If you took facts over your own prejudice more often you’d hold very different views".
You obviously have me down as some sort of ill informed idiot, and pass your declarations down from on high, without the slightest thought as to whether you are correct in your assumptions. 
Take a step back and stop acting like a tit.

gloswhite wrote:Bloody hell, all our prejudices are on show now. This really is getting too involved, with apparently none of us prepared to give much credence to others when they don't agree completely with our own views. A lot like our politicians really, who who condemn for the same responses.

TROY, do you realise how little credibility you have when you come up with comments like this; 
" If you took facts over your own prejudice more often you’d hold very different views".
You obviously have me down as some sort of ill informed idiot, and pass your declarations down from on high, without the slightest thought as to whether you are correct in your assumptions. 
Take a step back and stop acting like a tit.

T.R.O.Y wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:The court has no right interfearing, same with that Fuck Head Bercow.

The court have no right to apply the law.

What a stupid thing to say.

They are all remainers, they have no right to sabotage the referendum result, we all know what's going on i just hope boris finds a way round these treacherous cunts.

gloswhite wrote:Bloody hell, all our prejudices are on show now. This really is getting too involved, with apparently none of us prepared to give much credence to others when they don't agree completely with our own views. A lot like our politicians really, who who condemn for the same responses.

TROY, do you realise how little credibility you have when you come up with comments like this; 
" If you took facts over your own prejudice more often you’d hold very different views".
You obviously have me down as some sort of ill informed idiot, and pass your declarations down from on high, without the slightest thought as to whether you are correct in your assumptions. 
Take a step back and stop acting like a tit.

You’re desperate to drag this away from the point.

Do you think the courts have got it wrong twice? Because that is the only way you can justify the claim she’s doing this solely for attention.

Angry Dad wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:The court has no right interfearing, same with that Fuck Head Bercow.

The court have no right to apply the law.

What a stupid thing to say.

They are all remainers, they have no right to sabotage the referendum result, we all know what's going on i just hope boris finds a way round these treacherous cunts.

So the Supreme Court are corrupt?

There is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with Angry Dad or karly. They don’t seem capable of it.