T.R.O.Y. wrote:Well done guys, proved everyone wrong on that whole constant sniping at each other thing.
I see it more as cause and effect.
I don't mind what anyone says on the internet/social media, it is after all open to anyone who connects to it whether they are the most sanist in the world or the most insaneist!
I don't even communicate anywhere else on the internet other than on Nuts apart from with my family/friends directly or with work.
I mean what's the point really, you could be talking/disagreeing with anyone really.
In real life when we talk to people they simply would not say or react as many of them choose to do on the internet - and if they did, you'd soon move away and have nothing further to do with them.
So why do I post on Nuts then?
For me I set up with others a little area to chat and have fun in regard to a mutual interest - BWFC. We set it up simply because we didn't like how similar BWFC forums were run.
We opened our doors to everyone and had few rules other than keep things on the right side of the law and expected people to self moderate as we all are grown ups on here.
Things went well until we hit the hatred by two people in particular over Brexit and Anderson.
It turned the site toxic.
One of the two left the site and became multi banned on twitter for posting how he had on here, he's on about his twelfth new Twitter account by now (all the rest being should down by the Twitter site for unacceptable behaviour) and no doubt he'll be heading for a thirteenth soon!
The other being Wanderlust who rages still about Brexit (although he voted for it - work that one out?) and who dug a hole so deep about how he told us what a crook Anderson was, that he is unable to climb out of it without losing face - which he clearly won't do.
My posting and behaviour as site owner, if you will, were to prevent things going too far and to counter the more absurd posts with reasoned and factual information where possible countering such shite.
This inevitably led to abuse of me and behaviour patterns that are still apparent even to the post of his above.
As they say it takes two to Tango.
His initial post on this thread was done deliberately and knowingly - so that set off the 'cause' and my reply to be the 'effect'.
Once you get to see that then you can begin to read him like I can - his actions betray his intent.
He doesn't think he's part of the problem at all, he's in fact the cause of it.
He won't change though - just as I predicted and was proved right within minutes above!!!
The owners of all the other forums would have banned him long ago if he posted to them like he does to me - re-read his last post on this thread for instance - but I let him (and Bread) post his shit until it went too far and - after multitudes of warnings - banned them.
And to remind people it was Wanderlust who asked to be unbanned and return here and not the other way around!
If this was real life I'd keep clear of his company so that our paths did not cross but I can't do that on Nuts.
If he wants to play nice like everyone else then fine, if he wants to post shite, I'll correct him, if he wants to deliberately challenge me - and we know he does - he'll be answered.
That's the way it is with some people and he's one of them - he thinks he knows absolutely everything, he's never wrong and when proven to be so he certainly won't admit it.
The balls in his court, let's see what he does with it.
Home
