Good to see you back Wander ![Smile](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_smile.gif)
![Smile](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_smile.gif)
I'm not mate, especially whilst I continue to see "Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you from sending private messages."karlypants wrote:Good to see you back Wander
Lusty, just let bygones be bygones, unanimously on here everybody asked Sluffy to allow you back and he has (cheers Sluffy) and I’m sure private messages will follow. No reason we can’t both visit WW as well although let’s face it attempting to have a rational and half intelligent discussion on any subject on there is nigh on impossible with “the cabal” only interested in insults and abuse rather than reasoned arguments. How is the Tory government doing?? 🥴wanderlust wrote:
I'm not mate, especially whilst I continue to see "Sorry, but the administrator has prevented you from sending private messages."
I guess "the administrator" has been reading the "private" messages
Whitesince63 wrote:unanimously on here everybody asked Sluffy to allow you back
Obviously I meant everybody that matters.Natasha Whittam wrote:
A big fat lie.
Welcome back Boggers, hope Michael Bolton brings his big suitcase with him if he comes backBoggersbelief wrote:Wanderlust and sluffys hatred for each other got boring years ago. But the site went to the dogs long before that. It was around the time boring old wokies like okocha, wessy and Finlay turned up, they absolutely killed the banter the likes of myself, Scott, norpig, bonce, bread man, Nat, angry dad, Magoo and many others partook in. All good things come to an end I suppose.
The powers that be should make me sole owner of the site, I’ll bring back the big dogs and eliminate the pests. Michael Bolton is already on board should my plan go through
Norpig wrote:Perhaps we should all put more effort into posting more threads?
Time for other mods or someone completely new to step up then as I’m out!Natasha Whittam wrote:Norpig wrote:Perhaps we should all put more effort into posting more threads?
What's the point?
You get a thread going and then KP comes along and posts 12 videos from BWFC social media informing us the team are "going to give their all" and "will learn from their mistakes" followed by 33 bits of "news" from the BN site telling us about Kyle Dempsey's favourite pair of socks.
I go on a lot of football forums and I've never seen this level of "news" anywhere.
The "news" needs to be ditched completely, it's sucking the life out of the site.
Mods posting one original thread a day would be far more beneficial to the site than 40 copied threads.
karlypants wrote:Time for other mods or someone completely new to step up then as I’m out!Natasha Whittam wrote:Norpig wrote:Perhaps we should all put more effort into posting more threads?
What's the point?
You get a thread going and then KP comes along and posts 12 videos from BWFC social media informing us the team are "going to give their all" and "will learn from their mistakes" followed by 33 bits of "news" from the BN site telling us about Kyle Dempsey's favourite pair of socks.
I go on a lot of football forums and I've never seen this level of "news" anywhere.
The "news" needs to be ditched completely, it's sucking the life out of the site.
Mods posting one original thread a day would be far more beneficial to the site than 40 copied threads.
Sluffy wrote:karlypants wrote:Time for other mods or someone completely new to step up then as I’m out!Natasha Whittam wrote:Norpig wrote:Perhaps we should all put more effort into posting more threads?
What's the point?
You get a thread going and then KP comes along and posts 12 videos from BWFC social media informing us the team are "going to give their all" and "will learn from their mistakes" followed by 33 bits of "news" from the BN site telling us about Kyle Dempsey's favourite pair of socks.
I go on a lot of football forums and I've never seen this level of "news" anywhere.
The "news" needs to be ditched completely, it's sucking the life out of the site.
Mods posting one original thread a day would be far more beneficial to the site than 40 copied threads.
Well that is the end of the site if you do Karly because people only come to here for three reasons and those are they which I rank in the order I believe are most popular.
The first is to read what little there is posted on here - and that is mainly the everyday threads from the Bolton News, which most people (including myself) wouldn't see otherwise because we live away from Bolton.
Yes of course we could subscribe to the Bolton News to view it ourselves and although it may be a couple of pounds per month to do so, it isn't worth it to us - in my case I left Bolton 40 years ago and the only interest I still have is of the clubs news - and frankly Iles articles aren't even worth that to me.
I'll read them for free if they are posted up though.
The second is for Radio Nuts.
And lastly for the thoughts and views of the few who are left who still bother to post on here.
There's simply no longer enough people left posting to make that the foremost reason for viewing here as it once use to be.
Frankly we destroyed the site ourselves with all the fake accounts, hated (Brexit, Anderson, Tory Party...) and deliberate winding up, trolling and pointless arguments that others didn't want to read on here.
No one else will step up to fill your shoes Karly as no one else cares as much about the site as you do.
If you really feel as though you come to the end of the road then it is a big thank you and a debt of gratitude that you are owed by me and everyone else who as enjoyed Nuts and your massive and outstanding contribution to it since you joined us on here.
To Natasha all I can say is to remind you of the saying 'be careful what you wish for lest it come true'.
It seems your wish may well be granted soon...
...but it also may well be the final nail in the coffin for the site when it does...
Who the hell will be bothered coming to Nuts when there is only about three new posts a day to read?
Natasha Whittam wrote:KP, don't take it personally, I love you, but the "news" dilutes the site. There are so many articles lifted from the BN that it's hard to see the few original threads that get started.
I can only speak for myself, but I can't be arsed starting a new thread because I know in a few hours it'll be halfway down the page and lost amid the "news".
Plus, are you 100% sure it's legal to post paid content for free without permission?
karlypants wrote:That's why most content I post goes in the News section. The odd articles every week get posted in the Banter section to try and provoke debate.
Dempsey prefers 100% woollen socks in black, what is your preferred sock?
Natasha Whittam wrote:Plus, are you 100% sure it's legal to post paid content for free without permission?
Last edited by Sluffy on Sun 30 Apr - 19:55; edited 1 time in total
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum