Wanderers in £2.5m funding hole but "players will be paid" insists co-owner Ken Anderson

Breadman wrote:...provided they don't just sell the alloys and then abandon the car at the side of the road and run away.....

Breadman wrote:...provided they don't just sell the alloys and then abandon the car at the side of the road and run away.....

Barb Dwyer wrote:

Sluffy wrote:Your just a wum with an agenda mate - that's obvious to all.

You pm-ed personal abuse to someone else - that's a fact.

I could have banned you for that alone, full stop - but I didn't.

So how the fuck could I be making out 'justification for banning you' - I didn't ban you!

As for your nonsensically never ending argument for arguments sake - clearly brought up again to deflect your abusive pm sending -

bwfc1874 wrote:You asked for a credible alternative to Birch manipulating the ST in Davies's favour. Birch was there to find a buyer for the club, so just about every action he could have taken at the time could be perceived to be for the benefit of the club (and as such Davies).

What utter drivel.

If I go to a garage and ask them to sell MY car - I'm not doing it for the 'benefit' of my car!

But if your car is sat in a garage gathering rust and on a one way trip to the scrap yard then surely it is for the benefit of your car if the garage finds a nice family to treat it right. Even if the only reason they bought it is to do it up and sell it on quickly.

karlypants wrote:

Breadman wrote:...provided they don't just sell the alloys and then abandon the car at the side of the road and run away.....

Did they pay for the car with fake notes? If so then probably Scousers!

Sluffy wrote:Your just a wum with an agenda mate - that's obvious to all.

You pm-ed personal abuse to someone else - that's a fact.

I could have banned you for that alone, full stop - but I didn't.

So how the fuck could I be making out 'justification for banning you' - I didn't ban you!

As for your nonsensically never ending argument for arguments sake - clearly brought up again to deflect your abusive pm sending -

bwfc1874 wrote:You asked for a credible alternative to Birch manipulating the ST in Davies's favour. Birch was there to find a buyer for the club, so just about every action he could have taken at the time could be perceived to be for the benefit of the club (and as such Davies).

What utter drivel.

If I go to a garage and ask them to sell MY car - I'm not doing it for the 'benefit' of my car!

If I go to an estate agents and ask them to sell MY house - I'm not doing it for the 'benefit' of my house!

Davies asked Birch to sell HIS club - and getting the best price for it was what he wanted and bollocks to the 'benefit' of the club.

If he REALLY wanted the ST to have it don't you think they would have been the new owners now and not Holdsworth and Anderson?

People can see through your game now mate.

They wont forget how you behaved to others either no matter how hard you try to divert the attention away.

scottjames30 wrote: bwfc1874 threatening Johnny by PM

scottjames30 wrote: bwfc1874 threatening Johnny by PM

y2johnny wrote:

scottjames30 wrote: bwfc1874 threatening Johnny by PM

I apologise for calling everyone a cunt.  Apart from JAH and masterblaster.

bwfc1874 wrote:
You (again) ignore the key point I asked you to address, an alternative scenario to your version of events. If Birch believed the Holdsworth offer was dead then going to the ST was a contingency to fall back on rather than a sinister attempt to increase rival bids. 

You can try and dismiss that as wumming all you want but you haven't given a reason why that cannot have been the case.

bwfc1874 wrote:
On the rest of your post, not sure what people see me for now? I've always been argumentative it serves me pretty well in life to be honest. If Johnny and I are at risk of being banned for abusing each other over PM then I'm sure we can both live with that.

Sluffy wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:
You (again) ignore the key point I asked you to address, an alternative scenario to your version of events. If Birch believed the Holdsworth offer was dead then going to the ST was a contingency to fall back on rather than a sinister attempt to increase rival bids. 

You can try and dismiss that as wumming all you want but you haven't given a reason why that cannot have been the case.

But I have!

The ST is first in line with Administrator under Football League guidelines.

Buying the club out of Administration is the cheapest way to purchase the club.

Why would anyone pay more than they had to?

The ST is not in it to make a profit so the more they paid over any possible Administration price would take away the precious funds they had to invest in the club?

Also IF they were really there for the reason you say then why didn't they simply step down when Holdsworth reappeared on the scene again?  (For what it is worth I doubt he ever truly left the scene at all in the first place).

The only plausible explanation seems to be that Birch gave the ST sufficient belief that they were a realistic entity to buy the club in preference to Holdsworth and thus launched a bid for Preferred Bidder status and thus forcing Holdsworth to react to it.

Why else would the ST be clutching at straws demanding financial knowledge of Holdsworth bid the day before the final court hearing?  They clearly wanted to stop Holdsworths bid if they could.

It seems to me they completely were led to believe they were going to buy the club and were there to stop Holdsworth bid and got jilted at the alter by the sale to Holdsworth and not to them.

Why did the ST really believe they could buy the club - because Birch led them to get involved.

Why did Birch lead them to get involved unless it was beneficial to Davies financial position?

bwfc1874 wrote:
On the rest of your post, not sure what people see me for now? I've always been argumentative it serves me pretty well in life to be honest. If Johnny and I are at risk of being banned for abusing each other over PM then I'm sure we can both live with that.

Arguing for arguing sake might have served you well in your life but this forum is where others share a few moments of their time for a bit of enjoyment.

Reading endless and often pointless arguments that now includes trawling through other peoples twitter history's is not the kind of enjoyment most of them seek.

scottjames30 wrote:I'm going to send you a PM Johnny....

Barb Dwyer wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

scottjames30 wrote: bwfc1874 threatening Johnny by PM

I apologise for calling everyone a cunt.  Apart from JAH and masterblaster.

You called everyone a cunt? Apology not accepted.

y2johnny wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:I'm going to send you a PM Johnny....

Not got it sj

scottjames30 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:I'm going to send you a PM Johnny....

Not got it sj

sorry mate, I forgot how to send one.

boltonbonce wrote:

karlypants wrote:

Breadman wrote:...provided they don't just sell the alloys and then abandon the car at the side of the road and run away.....

Did they pay for the car with fake notes? If so then probably Scousers!

I gave them the money. They didn't susoect a thing.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]