Latest on administration - Updated See Post #109

I've had to look up Ron Jeremy. (Not a pleasant task).
Seems he was in this. Amongst others.

There was no "thing" involving myself and breadman, I got over that a long time ago

whatsgoingon wrote:

Norpig wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:And with respect, the thing between the Boggersbelief character and myself predates your arrival on this site by quite a long time, so fuck off and keep your beak out, cunty bollocks.

it was such a measured response until the last paragraph 

Which is where the real Breadman1.0 resurfaced

Nah, I just don't like you.

As I said, me and Boggers have been at it for years and he's more than capable of looking after himself, so fuck off and keep your nose out, twatty face.

Your obvious desperation to constantly be involved is becoming not only irksome, but embarrassing to boot.

Boggersbelief wrote:There was no "thing" involving myself and breadman, I got over that a long time ago

You fucking love it, don't lie.

boltonbonce wrote:I've had to look up Ron Jeremy. (Not a pleasant task).
Seems he was in this. Amongst others.

You were probably on a cyber watch-list prior to today, however if by some miracle you weren't you definitely are now.

I've been led astray on here. I'm going back to the' Dad's Army Appreciation Society' site,where I can roam free.
£10 a year for anyone interested.

Bread2.0 wrote:
Nah, I just don't like you.

Jesus how am I going to sleep knowing that a big spoiled kid with the mental age of 5 has thrown his toys out of the pram again because he doesn't like me.
You're OK till someone disagrees with you then you turn into a nasty opinionated prick beyond all sense of reason.
And you also clearly bare grudges and maintain agenda's, you really are a nasty hateful little man.

boltonbonce wrote:I've been led astray on here. I'm going back to the' Dad's Army Appreciation Society' site,where I can roam free.
£10 a year for anyone interested.

Don't panic

boltonbonce wrote:

Best

One

Yet

whatsgoingon wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:
Nah, I just don't like you.

And you also clearly bare grudges and maintain agenda's, you really are a nasty hateful little man.

...and you can't spell or punctuate your comments properly.

What's your point?

Chairmanda wrote:

Norpig wrote:Sluffy do you really think the ST has that much clout?

I could imagine a scenario where Dean is feeling v bruised from the way he perceives he has been treated and sidelined once his value to get fans inside had been deployed, and an approach from the ST saying they back him, not to sell out, post admin they will take over, he can be chair, force KAs hand might be seductive

Manda can clearly see a somewhat similar scenario to which I have alluded to above Norpig.

To put things simply, as I see it the those in charge of the ST wants OWNERSHIP full stop!

They can't have that whilst Anderson is there.

Anderson HAD an agreement with Holdsworth over his shares (hence being able to say the future is secure, thus having the accounts signed off, thereby allowing the public Anderson Q and A).

Someone changed Holdsworth mind - and right at the last moment too, to create maximum disruption!

Who else had anything to gain from destabilising the club under Anderson other than the few individuals in charge at the ST?

I don't think the ST has much 'clout' at all as you put it Norpig but more have their own personal agenda (I don't honestly believe the majority of its own members want it to own the club) and have spied an ideal opportunity to undermine Anderson and possibly even gain potentially themselves by tipping the club into Administration.

If people think I'm being too far fetched about this, then think about how many people have said they would rather the club lose matches to force out unpopular managers such as Coyle, Freedman, Lennon, etc, than win and keep them in a job!

Is it really that far fetched to see a few individuals do the same thing with (in their opinion) an unpopular club owner in order to get him out and take charge themselves?

at least it's got everyone posting again 

To summarise:
* We have cashflow problems
* There may or may not be a move to dump Deano with a view to control
* There may or may not be investors in the wings
* KA may or may not have sufficient dosh to bankroll the club
* We may or may not survive this one.
* There is considerable speculation as to the motives of the key players

What a steaming pile of poo.

boltonbonce wrote:I've had to look up Ron Jeremy. (Not a pleasant task).
Seems he was in this. Amongst others.

My mate Dan co-wrote that movie. Its awful.

wanderlust wrote:To summarise:
* We have cashflow problems
* There may or may not be a move to dump Deano with a view to control
* There may or may not be investors in the wings
* KA may or may not have sufficient dosh to bankroll the club
* We may or may not survive this one.
* There is considerable speculation as to the motives of the key players

What a steaming pile of poo.

I think you are being a bit harsh on your own post there mate!

It's the 'gossip' that keeps forums like ours going!

Interesting tweet from superagent73



Which would seem to imply that Iles is being kept in the loop and that other parties are not

i feel a bit sorry for Deano, he came flying in on his white charger all fired up and KA has pissed on his chips and left him out in the cold.

I would like to see him still involved in the club in some capacity when he sells his shares.

You do know that Superagent73 is Lee Anderson, right?

Ken's lad.

So whilst he may be "in the loop", he's definitely only hearing one side of the story.