Lusty permanently banned?

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Sluffy why have I had a message from not so plain Jane asking me why she's been banned?

Is Jayne one of your ex-girlfriends Hipster?

I'm still here. (physically, if not mentally) 

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Sluffy why have I had a message from not so plain Jane asking me why she's been banned?

Is Jayne one of your ex-girlfriends Hipster?

She was too high maintenance nat.

Demanded too many Twirls ?

Hipster_Nebula wrote:She was too high maintenance nat.

Are you sure it wasn't your sarcasm that killed the romance?

gloswhite wrote:Demanded too many Twirls ?

Don't joke about Twirls.

Sorry dear 

Don't judge me but seeing as this site has been so quiet i've been on ww a bit lately and pm'd a few times with Lusty. He passes on his best wishes to all (even Sluffy).

He's under the impression he is permanently banned, is that right? I don't want to be stirring anything up just asking a question.

Surely not. I mean the life time ban not the best wishes to sluffy.

He can be a right pain in the arse, but can't we all, (except Nat of course).

Bring him back so that we can all moan at him a week later. Some of his posts I actually agreed with, (about 3 I think )

Norpig wrote:Don't judge me but seeing as this site has been so quiet i've been on ww a bit lately and pm'd a few times with Lusty. He passes on his best wishes to all (even Sluffy).

He's under the impression he is permanently banned, is that right? I don't want to be stirring anything up just asking a question.

He's free to post again if he wants but let me make it absolutely clear I'm certainly not here to take the abusive, self-opinionated, argumentative (and often factually wrong) shit from him that he thinks/believes he has a right to post towards me.

I've had enough dealing with trolls recently and similarly I'd had enough dealing with nutjobs like him in the past and that's why he's been having to post on ww for the last few months.

Unsurprisingly he's learnt that he can't say and behave like he did on here, over there - clearly why he's put out feelers to come back.

If he want's to act reasonably on here like the rest of us then he can do but the minute he reverts back to his old ways he'll be gone - and for good this time.

If he (or anyone else) can't accept those conditions then there's no point in him returning.

Thanks Sluffy i'll pass it on to him.

You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

T.R.O.Y. wrote:You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

You didn't need to post that. You could have just seen Sluffy's good deed for what it was without making something out of it and moved on.

T.R.O.Y. wrote:You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

I've just said I've had enough of trolls - you hardly post any other time other than to try to wind me up.

If you care to even look back on this very thread I've told you previously that in SEVEN YEARS only THREE people have ever been banned - and Bread has since been unbanned to pay his respects to poor Rammy who told us he was terminally ill (for the record Bread didn't bother) and Wanderlust who was banned at that time (for abuse), allowed back only to continue in the same way, banned yet again and now again free to post also - no more chances though, he's had plenty and never seems to learn from them.

The third person tried to hack into my personal details and post stuff on ww - so clearly he won't be returning.

So it's just consistent bollocks from you yet again to stir the pot and seek a reaction - someone else who seems not to want to learn.

So just to emphasise the point about being serious about dealing with trolling and nutjobs, you've earned yourself a days ban.

If you don't like how the site will be run from now on then don't bother returning.

The sites suffered enough from individuals like you and Wanderlust putting yourselves first and the enjoyment of the rest of us a long way second - and that simply has to stop if we want the forum to survive.

I can't be clearer than that.

Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

Sluffy wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

It's in the Rammywhite thread.

Thanks for the confirmation KP.

karlypants wrote:

Sluffy wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

It's in the Rammywhite thread.

No, we are talking about two different things.

Bread's ban was lifted so he could communicate with Rammy on his sad prognosis and in effect say his goodbye to him along with the rest of us - he didn't bother - and that was the point I was making.

Yes, he did post on the thread of Rammy's daughter announcing his passing, which you correctly refer to.

Still the original point I was making stands - namely Bread isn't banned, nor anyone else bar one - and he attempted to hack into my personal and family life!