The future of Nuts

So apparently I am free to post but I cannot pm anyone.

Thank you to those who have supported me on here while I have been banned.

For the benefit of all those who have not followed this saga (hi Hip Priest) I am not a fake account and have never posted on here using another account. At the risk of being banned again I set out at some length the truth of the matter below. I am not trolling Sluffy. I simply want him to admit he is mistaken and apologise.

1. Sluffy won't provide any evidence to back up his mistaken belief and won't explain why he can't reveal his evidence
2. he won't even name who the "real" me is supposed to be. I suspect he thinks I am Nat (I am not) who has denied this on at least two occasions and is probably finding the whole thing very amusing
3. he has previously accused me and TROY of being the same person (we are not)
4. he says he banned me for trolling him when a look at the post (post 43 in the Keir Starmer thread) that got me banned clearly shows that I was not trolling him. What in the post I quote below in full constitutes trolling?

You make the totally incorrect accusation that I "posted for a reaction first and foremost" when the reason I posted was simply to ask you to justify your sweeping statement that all politicians are the same.

You now seem to have admitted that they are not by saying "of course Labour and Conservative governments do different things". So it is not a false belief that one side is better than the other.

Asking you to justify what you say is not trolling.

5. he claims (in post 159) that me asking for proof that this is a fake account shows I must be a fake
6. he ignores the fact that karly (post 179) confirms that he doesn't think this is a fake account
7. he is now claiming I post on "more than one account" again with no evidence
8. he has stopped me using pm. Does this mean he can read our pm's? He has ignored okocha's specific question regarding this.

Altogether I feel I have been treated pretty badly by Sluffy simply because I disagreed with him. I leave it to you all to make up your own minds about this but I will let it drop and won't comment on it again unless Sluffy disputes any of the above facts.

I stand by all I've said.

People can believe whatever they want, it is only the internet after all.

I'm not here though to be abused or trolled and when people deliberately won't stop doing one or both of those after I've asked them nicely to pack it in on numerous occasions and after several warnings I will put the stop to it, because clearly they don't ever intend doing so.

It's as simple as that.

When is my best mates ban up? Can't wait for him to come back 

Norpig wrote:When is my best mates ban up? Can't wait for him to come back 

Saturday night I think. I've put a tag on him, and he's presently in Dale Vince's dustbin.

boltonbonce wrote:
Saturday night I think. I've put a tag on him, and he's presently in Dale Vince's dustbin.

The restraining order must have ended 

Norpig wrote:
The restraining order must have ended 

I think Nat thinks he's Breadman. Outrageous suggestion. He'd have surely let me in on the joke.

boltonbonce wrote:
I think Nat thinks he's Breadman. Outrageous suggestion. He'd have surely let me in on the joke.

Whoever he is i hope he never comes back unless he's completely changed his ways.

Norpig wrote:Whoever he is i hope he never comes back unless he's completely changed his ways.

I hold out little hope of that. Might be an interesting weekend.

I must say, since coming back from my Nuts holiday, I've been pleasantly surprised at the relative harmony on show.
Even Lusty's put his fishing tackle away, and is making do with a pond net and breadcrumbs.
Probably can't last. I'm sure Sluffy will be watching us with a wary eye.

boltonbonce wrote:I must say, since coming back from my Nuts holiday, I've been pleasantly surprised at the relative harmony on show.
Even Lusty's put his fishing tackle away, and is making do with a pond net and breadcrumbs.
Probably can't last. I'm sure Sluffy will be watching us with a wary eye.

Couple of days of peace after KP reminded him of his responsibilities, but unfortunately he couldn't help himself and he started having a dig again.
I'll try to stay out of it, but when he completely fails to grasp what I'm saying, or puts a twisted spin on it, or insults me based on "what he thinks I'm thinking" - and he really has no clue - it simply serves to remind me that the site doesn't have the facility for individual contributors to block him, so we just have to put up with his nonsensical rambling and keyboard warrior insults. Hey ho...

We've enjoyed some peaceful, good-natured periods in the last six months, but an irritating lack of self-awareness inevitably wrecks the harmony via some desperate attempts to prove intellectual superiority.

okocha wrote:We've enjoyed some peaceful, good-natured periods in the last six months, but an irritating lack of self-awareness inevitably wrecks the harmony via some desperate attempts to prove intellectual superiority.

Hope Nat comes back. I miss being called an utter gobshite.

boltonbonce wrote:
Hope Nat comes back. I miss being called an utter gobshite.

You’re just an utter gobshite bonce.

Whitesince63 wrote:
You’re just an utter gobshite bonce.

Thanks. I appreciate you trying to help, but the venom just isn’t there.

boltonbonce wrote:

Whitesince63 wrote:
You’re just an utter gobshite bonce.

Thanks. I appreciate you trying to help, but the venom just isn’t there.

Haha yeah Nat had that special touch.

boltonbonce wrote:

I don't think you would have caught Bertrand Russell wearing a banana-yellow suit and jiving away to 'Down the road apiece', would you Boncey? Great version of the song btw.



But I wholly approve of the idea of finding out the facts before spouting off with opinions.