Takeover imminent?

Norpig wrote:Sluffy if you can't see it then i'm just pissing in the wind. When you do post it's generally an attack on Lusty who to be fair to you, does like to wind you up with great success.

Just because i'm the only one sticking his head above the parapet doesn't mean others aren't thinking exactly the same as me.

Sluffy wrote:

Norpig wrote:Sluffy if you can't see it then i'm just pissing in the wind. When you do post it's generally an attack on Lusty who to be fair to you, does like to wind you up with great success.

Just because i'm the only one sticking his head above the parapet doesn't mean others aren't thinking exactly the same as me.

I see it - and that's why I've not posted many comments on here recently.

The first time I have in a while, I deliberately kept it non personal.

Wanderlust immediately made it personal about me.

I must be getting old or soft or something but I no longer want to post on forums (even my own) where I'm attacked all the time.

I don't care if people I don't know and never will meet, like me or not.  

I don't post on forums to be popular or for my own self esteem, I simply post because I like to think I'm contributing something that others might have overlooked or missed.  I try to be even handed and fair the best I can and not simply follow the crowd.

I don't care if I'm unpopular simply because I've questioned how the ST has behaved, that I've pointed out that Iles clearly has an agenda against Anderson and was very pro-Holdsworth, and that I much prefer to see the facts and figures before condemning Anderson out of hand every single time - as many people do.

Fine if you don't like what I say and feel free to have your own say if you disagree but I simply no longer want to be personally attacked, made out to be weird or get involved in ad nauseum arguments over nothing much in particular.

Nuts was a place intended for fun - not to hold and carry on personal internet vendettas - some that date back over a decade ago would you believe!

I know things change and social media which forums are part of, change too but as a pensioner myself I simply don't understand the need (or hatred) to constantly personally attack people simply for holding a different view to them?

It's certainly not a age thing as Wanderlust is of the same generation as myself.

I don't find it pleasant to be on here very much these days.

I'm sure I'm far from being the only one either.

finlaymcdanger wrote:More importantly, why isn't my avatar displaying? Can someone get the Nuts tech team on it?

finlaymcdanger wrote:More importantly, why isn't my avatar displaying? Can someone get the Nuts tech team on it?

Growler wrote:fao Sluffy

I think it was only on Wanderers Ways you were labelled a wierdo for your daily attacks on anyone who criticised Anderson in public.I suspected you might be on Andersons payroll to attack anyone who criticised him but since you stopped posting for a while probably not.
On WW you invited people to mock a young Bolton fan involved in organising the protest at the West Brom match by posting links to to his CV and an article about him doing an iron man challenge or something..You were playing to about 5 or 6 staunch Anderson fanatics on WW and appearing odd to the silent majority.Your attack on the lad didn't have the desired effect.A long term poster on WW provided a link to some charity work the lad is doing and donated to it, others criticised your behavior

If you are truly a great fan of Anderson and want to defend him, post positive words about the fine things you think Anderson has done for the club, don't launch personal attacks on fans who criticise him.Mocking other fans might be easier than finding positive things to say about Anderson but it makes you look a right cunt

finlaymcdanger wrote:More importantly, why isn't my avatar displaying? Can someone get the Nuts tech team on it?

T.R.O.Y wrote:I was certain there was something going on with the takeover after all these posts. What a let down.

Natasha Whittam wrote:We're all waiting for you Boggers, surely you know what's really going on?

Boggersbelief wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:We're all waiting for you Boggers, surely you know what's really going on?

Do I fuck

But at least my usual bollocks gives people hope

Growler wrote:fao Sluffy

I think it was only on Wanderers Ways you were labelled a wierdo for your daily attacks on anyone who criticised Anderson in public.I suspected you might be on Andersons payroll to attack anyone who criticised him but since you stopped posting for a while probably not.
On WW you invited people to mock a young Bolton fan involved in organising the protest at the West Brom match by posting links to to his CV and an article about him doing an iron man challenge or something..You were playing to about 5 or 6 staunch Anderson fanatics on WW and appearing odd to the silent majority.Your attack on the lad didn't have the desired effect.A long term poster on WW provided a link to some charity work the lad is doing and donated to it, others criticised your behavior

If you are truly a great fan of Anderson and want to defend him, post positive words about the fine things you think Anderson has done for the club, don't launch personal attacks on fans who criticise him.Mocking other fans might be easier than finding positive things to say about Anderson but it makes you look a right cunt

Sluffy wrote wrote:"use my personal experience of being a senior officer in a multimillion organisation"

wanderlust wrote:

Sluffy wrote wrote:"use my personal experience of being a senior officer in a multimillion organisation"

Bearing in mind that the average SME is a "multimillion organisation" e.g. a local builder or the local gym, why do you feel the need to to say this? The old adage that turnover is vanity and profit is sanity springs to mind. 

Even Whittam International must be in that league. And Norpig is indispensible in a multibillion organisation so presumably his opinion carries far more weight?

And "senior officers" are staff anyway so don't get too carried away with your own self-importance, especially in this company.

wanderlust wrote:

Sluffy wrote wrote:"use my personal experience of being a senior officer in a multimillion organisation"

Bearing in mind that the average SME is a "multimillion organisation" e.g. a local builder or the local gym, why do you feel the need to to say this? The old adage that turnover is vanity and profit is sanity springs to mind. 

Even Whittam International must be in that league. And Norpig is indispensible in a multibillion organisation so presumably his opinion carries far more weight?

And "senior officers" are staff anyway so don't get too carried away with your own self-importance, especially in this company.